CVE-2017-13308
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn tscpu_write_GPIO_out and mtkts_Abts_write of mtk_ts_Abts.c, there is a possible buffer overflow in an sscanf due to improper input validation. This could lead to a local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the sscanf() function within tscpu_write_GPIO_out and mtkts_Abts_write functions in mtk_ts_Abts.c (a MediaTek thermal driver). The sscanf lacks proper bounds checking on input, allowing a local attacker with system execution privileges to overflow a buffer and escalate privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm MediaTek chipset is in useCheck /proc/cpuinfo for 'MediaTek' or 'MT' in the hardware/CPU information, or use 'getprop ro.hardware' to identify the device hardware platformAffected if The device does not use a MediaTek chipset - this vulnerability only affects MediaTek-based Android devices
-
Identify presence of the thermal driverSearch for the driver file mtk_ts_Abts.c in the kernel source tree or look for compiled thermal driver modules in /sys/modules/ (typically named mtk_ts_abts or similar thermal management modules)Affected if The mtk_ts_Abts thermal driver is not present on the device - the vulnerability only exists if this specific MediaTek thermal driver is present
-
Verify the driver is loaded or loadableCheck /proc/modules or run 'lsmod | grep -i thermal' to see if thermal management drivers are active; also check /sys/class/thermal/ for thermal zone listingsAffected if No MediaTek thermal driver is loaded - the exploit requires the vulnerable driver to be active in the kernel
-
Check kernel configuration for thermal driver supportIf kernel config is accessible (often in /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz), search for CONFIG_MTK_TS_ABTS or similar thermal driver configuration options set to y or mAffected if The MediaTek thermal driver (CONFIG_MTK_TS_ABTS or similar) is not enabled in the kernel configuration
The device is affected if it runs on a MediaTek chipset and has the mtk_ts_Abts thermal driver present and loaded, as the vulnerability exists in the sscanf() function within this driver across all Android versions on affected MediaTek hardware.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper input validation and buffer length checks on all sscanf format strings in the affected functions, ensuring user-supplied input cannot exceed destination buffer sizes.
Latest Android security patch level (minimum May 2018 or later when this CVE was addressed in Android Security Bulletin)
- 1. Check the current Android Security Patch Level on the device by going to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- 2. Verify if the device has received the Android security update that includes the fix for CVE-2017-13308
- 3. If an update is available, download and install it via Settings > System > Software Update
- 4. After updating, confirm the Security Patch Level reflects a date after the CVE was addressed in the Android Security Bulletin
- 5. If the device manufacturer no longer provides updates, consider upgrading to a device with ongoing security support or a custom ROM with recent security patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-13308 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-13308 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data