CVE-2017-1334
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM RELM 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 126242.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM RELM versions 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI. Attackers can embed arbitrary JavaScript code into the application interface, which executes in the browsers of other users within trusted sessions, potentially enabling credential theft or session hijacking.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0.3= 4.0.4= 4.0.5= 4.0.6= 4.0.7= 5.0.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed RELM versionCheck the installed version of IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager. This is typically found in the product's about section, installation directory, or by querying the application server (e.g., check the installation manifest, version file, or the /about endpoint if available).Affected if The installed version matches any of these exact versions: 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.5, 4.0.6, 4.0.7, 5.0.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, or 6.0.3
-
Confirm Web UI is accessibleVerify that the IBM RELM Web UI is exposed and accessible. This is typically accessed over HTTP/HTTPS on the configured application server port (often through WebSphere or similar). Check network exposure and authentication status.Affected if The Web UI is exposed without proper authentication or is accessible to untrusted users, enabling the stored XSS to affect other users
-
Review application logs for XSS indicatorsExamine IBM RELM server logs for any suspicious script injection attempts or unexpected JavaScript content being stored in user profile fields, comments, or other input areas within the Web UI.Affected if Logs reveal malicious script tags or JavaScript code embedded in user-supplied fields, indicating active exploitation or attempted exploitation of the XSS vulnerability
You are affected if IBM RELM version 4.0.3-4.0.7, 5.0.0-5.0.2, or 6.0.0-6.0.3 is installed and the Web UI is accessible to users who could be targeted by stored XSS attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or updates for IBM RELM. If no patch is available, implement robust input validation and output encoding across all user-supplied fields in the Web UI, and deploy Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1334 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data