CVE-2017-14021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key issue was discovered in Korenix JetNet JetNet5018G version 1.4, JetNet5310G version 1.4a, JetNet5428G-2G-2FX version 1.4, JetNet5628G-R version 1.4, JetNet5628G version 1.4, JetNet5728G-24P version 1.4, JetNet5828G version 1.1d, JetNet6710G-HVDC version 1.1e, and JetNet6710G version 1.1. An attacker may gain access to hard-coded certificates and private keys allowing the attacker to perform man-in-the-middle attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHard-coded cryptographic certificates and private keys are embedded in the firmware of multiple Korenix JetNet industrial network switch models. An attacker with access to these keys can impersonate the device or intercept traffic, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.4= 1.4a= 1.4= 1.4= 1.4= 1.4= 1.1d= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Korenix JetNet modelInspect the physical device label or access the device management interface (web UI or CLI) to determine the exact model number (e.g., JetNet5018g, JetNet5310g, JetNet5428g, JetNet5628g, JetNet5628g R, JetNet5728g 24p, JetNet5828g, or JetNet6710g)Affected if Model is any of the eight affected JetNet models listed in the CVE
-
Check installed firmware versionAccess the device CLI (via console/SSH) and run 'show version' or access the web management interface System > Firmware/Upgrade page to retrieve the current firmware version stringAffected if Firmware version matches: 1.4 (JetNet5018g, JetNet5428g, JetNet5628g, JetNet5628g R, JetNet5728g 24p), 1.4a (JetNet5310g), 1.1d (JetNet5828g), or 1.1 (JetNet6710g)
-
Compare against affected version listCross-reference your identified model and firmware version with the CVE-affected product/version matrix provided in the advisoryAffected if Your exact model and firmware version combination matches one of the eight affected combinations listed in the CVE
If your Korenix JetNet device model and firmware version match any of the eight affected combinations (1.4, 1.4a, 1.1d, or 1.1 depending on model), the device contains the hardcoded certificates and is vulnerable to impersonation and MITM attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace hardcoded certificates with unique, dynamically generated certificates; if vendor firmware update unavailable, isolate affected devices behind network segmentation and implement VPN tunnels to limit exposure.
Latest firmware version available from Korenix for your specific JetNet model (contact vendor for version numbers - the description notes JetNet6710G-HVDC version 1.1e was also affected, suggesting incremental fixes)
- Check Korenix (Korenix Technology) official website for the latest firmware versions for your specific JetNet model.
- Locate and download the most recent firmware release for your affected device model.
- Review the firmware release notes to confirm the version addresses CVE-2017-14021 (hard-coded cryptographic key removal).
- Follow the vendor's standard firmware upgrade procedure for your JetNet device, typically via web interface or TFTP.
- After upgrade, verify that the hard-coded certificates/keys have been replaced with unique, device-specific cryptographic material.
- Ensure HTTPS/tls configurations are regenerated post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data