CVE-2017-14286
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSTDU Viewer 1.6.375 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .jb2 file, related to a "User Mode Write AV starting at STDUJBIG2File!DllUnregisterServer+0x000000000000cb8c."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSTDU Viewer 1.6.375 contains a memory corruption vulnerability when parsing specially crafted .jb2 (JBIG2 image) files. The vulnerability triggers a User Mode Write Access Violation at a specific memory offset within the DLL, which can be leveraged for arbitrary code execution or cause application crash (denial of service).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.375CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate STDU Viewer installationSearch for stdview.exe in common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\STDU Viewer or C:\Program Files (x86)\STDU Viewer, or check Add/Remove Programs for STDU Viewer entryAffected if STDU Viewer is not found on the system, you are not affected
-
Get installed version of stdview.exeRight-click stdview.exe, select Properties, go to the Details tab, and check the Product Version field; alternatively run 'stdview.exe' with no arguments or check its version info via command promptAffected if Version is exactly 1.6.375, proceed to next check; if version differs, you are not affected by this specific CVE
-
Verify JBIG2 (.jb2) file handling capabilityCheck if STDU Viewer can open .jb2 files by attempting to open a .jb2 image file, or check file type associations in the applicationAffected if The application can parse and display .jb2 files (this is a built-in feature in version 1.6.375), and you have version 1.6.375, then you are affected
You are affected if STDU Viewer version 1.6.375 is installed and the application can open .jb2 (JBIG2) image files, as both conditions are required for the memory corruption vulnerability to trigger.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate STDU Viewer to the latest patched version, or if no update is available, restrict usage of STDU Viewer and avoid opening untrusted .jb2 files from unknown sources.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14286 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data