CVE-2017-14807
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in susestudio-ui-server of SUSE Studio onsite allows remote attackers with admin privileges in Studio to alter SQL statements, allowing for extraction and modification of data. This issue affects: SUSE Studio onsite susestudio-ui-server version 1.3.17-56.6.3 and prior versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SUSE Studio onsite's susestudio-ui-server component allows authenticated admin users to inject malicious SQL commands through input fields, enabling unauthorized data extraction or modification from the backend database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3<= 1.3.17-56.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SUSE Studio Onsite installationLocate the SUSE Studio Onsite installation directory or package and determine the installed version (e.g., check installed packages, RPM/YUM queries, or application metadata)Affected if Version equals 1.3 (specifically the 1.3 release)
-
Identify susestudio-ui-server versionQuery the susestudio-ui-server component/package for its installed version numberAffected if Version is at or below 1.3.17-56.6.3
-
Confirm admin access to susestudio-ui-serverVerify that the susestudio-ui-server web interface is accessible and that admin user accounts are configured (the vulnerability requires authenticated admin privileges)Affected if Admin interface is accessible with valid admin credentials
-
Verify input handling in database interactionsReview application configuration or logs to confirm that user-supplied input in admin-facing forms is processed through database queriesAffected if Admin input fields interact with backend database without evident parameterization
You are affected if SUSE Studio Onsite version 1.3 or susestudio-ui-server version 1.3.17-56.6.3 or lower is installed AND admin access to the susestudio-ui-server interface is available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements to properly sanitize user input in all database interactions, and apply vendor-supplied patches upgrading susestudio-ui-server beyond version 1.3.17-56.6.3.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14807 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14807 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data