CVE-2017-14852
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insecure communication was found between a user and the Orpak SiteOmat management console for all known versions, due to an invalid SSL certificate. The attack allows for an eavesdropper to capture the communication and decrypt the data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Orpak SiteOmat management console uses insecure communication due to improper SSL certificate validation, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept and decrypt sensitive data transmitted between users and the management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.414.084CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Orpak SiteOmat versionAccess the SiteOmat management console and navigate to the About or System Information page, or check the software installation directory for version filesAffected if The displayed version number is lower than 6.4.414.084
-
Verify SSL/TLS is enabled on the management interfaceAttempt to access the SiteOmat web interface using https:// and confirm the connection uses SSL/TLSAffected if The management console is accessible only over http or allows both http and https without enforcing encryption
-
Check SSL certificate validation configurationExamine the SiteOmat configuration files or SSL settings panel for options related to certificate validation, trust store configuration, or certificate verificationAffected if Certificate validation is disabled, set to optional, or the trust store is empty or misconfigured
-
Test SSL certificate chain validationUse a browser or SSL testing tool to connect to the SiteOmat management interface and observe whether invalid, self-signed, or expired certificates are accepted without warningAffected if Invalid or untrusted certificates are accepted without user warning or error
The environment is affected if the installed SiteOmat version is below 6.4.414.084 and the SSL certificate validation is disabled, optional, or improperly configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.4.414.084
Implement proper SSL certificate validation to ensure all communications are encrypted and the server's identity is verified.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14852 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14852 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data