CVE-2017-14906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-01-05 on Qualcomm Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, PKCS7 padding is not supported by the crypto storage APIs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe crypto storage APIs on affected Qualcomm Snapdragon IoT and mobile chipsets (MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8909W, SD 210/212/205, SD 410/12) lack support for PKCS7 padding, a standard block cipher padding scheme. This omission can cause decryption failures, interoperability issues with properly-padded data, and potential data exposure or corruption when standard padding is expected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck /proc/cpuinfo or use 'getprop' commands (e.g., 'getprop ro.board.platform', 'getprop ro.product.device') to retrieve the chipset or device model identifierAffected if The chipset model matches one of the affected variants: MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8909W, SD 210, SD 212, SD 205, SD 410, or SD 412
-
Confirm Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' to check the Android OS versionAffected if Android version is any version (the summary indicates all versions are affected)
-
Determine if crypto storage APIs are in useReview application code or system configuration to identify if data encryption/decryption is performed using the device's hardware crypto storage APIs (such as those in the Secure File Storage or Keymaster components)Affected if The device uses hardware-backed crypto storage functions for encrypting or decrypting stored data, particularly for file-based or block-level encryption
-
Verify firmware ageCheck if the device firmware and Android security patches predate the 2018-01-05 mitigation release using 'getprop ro.build.version.security.patch'Affected if The security patch level is earlier than January 2018, indicating the PKCS7 padding support may not yet be implemented
The device is affected if it contains one of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8909W, SD 210/212/205, SD 410/12) and uses hardware crypto storage APIs for data encryption, especially if the firmware predates the January 2018 patches.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Qualcomm firmware updates and Android security patches released after 2018-01-05 that add PKCS7 padding support to the crypto storage APIs; for unsupported devices, consider network segmentation and avoid storing sensitive data using affected cryptographic functions.
Android with January 5, 2018 security patch level or later (2018-01-05)
- 1. Identify if the affected device uses one of the vulnerable Qualcomm Snapdragon components: MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, or SD 410/12.
- 2. Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level).
- 3. If the patch level is earlier than January 5, 2018, check with the device OEM for available firmware updates containing the January 2018 Android Security Bulletin fixes.
- 4. Apply the OEM-provided system update that includes the January 2018 security patch level or later.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data