CVE-2017-16054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited`nodefabric` was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencenodefabric was a malicious npm module designed to hijack and exfiltrate environment variables from systems where it was installed. Environment variables commonly contain sensitive information such as API keys, database credentials, authentication tokens, and other secrets, which the module would capture and transmit to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check package.json for nodefabric dependencyInspect the dependencies and devDependencies sections of your project's package.json file for any entry of 'nodefabric'Affected if nodefabric appears in package.json dependencies
-
Verify nodefabric in installed modulesRun 'npm list nodefabric' or 'ls node_modules/nodefabric' to see if the package is physically installedAffected if nodefabric is present in node_modules or appears in npm list output
-
Inspect nodefabric package contentsExamine the contents of node_modules/nodefabric for any JavaScript files, especially the main entry point, and look for code that sends data to external URLs or references environment variablesAffected if The package contains scripts that exfiltrate process.env data
-
Check for suspicious network activityReview any network connections made by your application, particularly to unknown endpoints, and check if nodefabric was used to transmit environment variable contentsAffected if Network requests were made to attacker-controlled domains while nodefabric was installed
You are affected if nodefabric appears as a dependency in your project or is installed in node_modules, as any installation of this malicious module means your environment variables were potentially compromised.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately verify if nodefabric exists in any project dependencies and remove it entirely. Rotate all credentials, API keys, tokens, and secrets that may have been present in environment variables on systems where this module was installed, as they should be considered compromised.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data