CVE-2017-16239
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn OpenStack Nova through 14.0.9, 15.x through 15.0.7, and 16.x through 16.0.2, by rebuilding an instance, an authenticated user may be able to circumvent the Filter Scheduler bypassing imposed filters (for example, the ImagePropertiesFilter or the IsolatedHostsFilter). All setups using Nova Filter Scheduler are affected. Because of the regression described in Launchpad Bug #1732947, the preferred fix is a 14.x version after 14.0.10, a 15.x version after 15.0.8, or a 16.x version after 16.0.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn OpenStack Nova versions through 14.0.9, 15.0.7, and 16.0.2, the Filter Scheduler is bypassed during instance rebuild operations, allowing authenticated users to potentially deploy instances on hosts that should be filtered out by filters such as ImagePropertiesFilter or IsolatedHostsFilter. This is a regression from Launchpad Bug #1732947 where the scheduler filters are not applied when rebuilding an instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 14.0.9= 15.0.0= 15.0.1= 15.0.2= 15.0.3= 15.0.4= 15.0.5= 15.0.6= 15.0.7= 16.0.0= 16.0.1= 16.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nova versionRun `nova-manage --version` or check the Nova package version installed on the controller nodeAffected if The version is 14.0.9 or earlier, 15.0.0-15.0.7, or 16.0.0-16.0.2
-
Verify Filter Scheduler is in useCheck the `scheduler_driver` option in the Nova configuration file (typically nova.conf) under the [DEFAULT] sectionAffected if The scheduler_driver is set to `filter_scheduler.FilterScheduler` or another filter-based scheduler
-
Confirm ImagePropertiesFilter is enabledCheck the `enabled_filters` or `available_filters` option in the Nova scheduler configurationAffected if `ImagePropertiesFilter` appears in the list of enabled filters for the scheduler
-
Confirm IsolatedHostsFilter is enabledCheck the Nova scheduler configuration for `IsolatedHostsFilter` in the enabled filters listAffected if `IsolatedHostsFilter` appears in the list of enabled filters for the scheduler
-
Check rebuild operations bypass filtersReview scheduler logs or perform a test rebuild of an instance to a host that should be filtered out by ImagePropertiesFilter or IsolatedHostsFilterAffected if The instance rebuild succeeds on a host that should have been filtered out by the enabled scheduler filters
You are affected if your Nova version falls within 14.0.0-14.0.9, 15.0.0-15.0.7, or 16.0.0-16.0.2 AND you use Filter Scheduler with ImagePropertiesFilter or IsolatedHostsFilter enabled, and rebuild operations bypass these filters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Nova to version 14.0.10+, 15.0.8+, or 16.0.3+ to ensure Filter Scheduler filters are properly applied during instance rebuild operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16239 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data