Sterling File GatewayApplication · Ibm

CVE-2017-1632

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-12-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 133178.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2 contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its Web UI. Attackers can embed arbitrary JavaScript code into the web interface, potentially altering application functionality and enabling credential disclosure through a trusted user session.

MitigationApply IBM patches for Sterling File Gateway 2.2 as provided by IBM. Implement output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied data in the Web UI as an additional defensive measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sterling File GatewayApplication
Affected:= 2.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Sterling File Gateway installation
    Locate the installation directory typically under /opt/ibm/SterlingFileGateway or C:\IBM\SterlingFileGateway on Windows. Check for the presence of the sfg_<version> directory or theSFGroot directory structure.
    Affected if The product is not installed or cannot be found in expected locations.
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the version.properties or version.txt file within the installation directory, or run the version command if available from the installation: cd <install_dir>/bin and run version.sh or version.bat. Also check the WebSphere deployment for the application version.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.2 (as indicated by =2.2 in the affected versions).
  3. Verify Web UI component is enabled
    Check if the Web UI is accessible by attempting to reach the web interface URL (typically https://<host>:<port>/SterlingFileGateway or similar). Alternatively, check WebSphere console configurations or the deployed applications list for the SterlingFileGateway application status.
    Affected if The Web UI is enabled and accessible - this is required for the XSS to be exploitable.
  4. Check Web UI configuration files
    Examine the web.xml deployment descriptor or the SFG configuration files in the <install_dir>/properties directory for any custom security settings or XSS protection configurations that may already exist.
    Affected if No input validation or output encoding protections are configured for the Web UI.

A user is affected if IBM Sterling File Gateway version 2.2 is installed and the Web UI component is enabled, as this XSS vulnerability exists specifically in the Web UI of that version.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM patches for Sterling File Gateway 2.2 as provided by IBM. Implement output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied data in the Web UI as an additional defensive measure.

Fix this in Sterling File Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1632 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data