CVE-2017-16364
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to an untrusted pointer dereference when handling number format dictionary entries. In this scenario, the input is crafted in way that the computation results in pointers to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result in sensitive data exposure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Acrobat and Reader contain an untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability when handling number format dictionary entries. The application computes pointers to memory locations outside the process address space, and the subsequent read operation can expose sensitive data from memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Adobe productOpen Adobe Acrobat or Reader and go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat (or Reader). Alternatively, check Add/Remove Programs or the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Adobe for the product name.Affected if The product is Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Acrobat Reader (any variant) - the vulnerability affects both product lines.
-
Determine if this is a Continuous (Dc) or Classic versionCheck the product name displayed in About dialog or in the installed programs list. The 'Dc' suffix indicates the Continuous release track.Affected if Both Continuous (Dc) and Classic versions are affected, so this step only determines which version range to compare against.
-
Obtain the exact version numberIn the About dialog, note the full version number (for example: 11.0.22, 17.0.30066, 15.0.30355). The version format varies between product tracks.Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected ranges provided in the CVE.
-
Compare Classic version 11.x against affected rangeFor Classic Acrobat/Reader 11.x: if version number is <= 11.0.22, the installation is affected.Affected if Classic version 11.x is 11.0.22 or lower.
-
Compare Classic version 17.x against affected rangeFor Classic Acrobat/Reader 17.x: if version is >= 17.0 and <= 17.011.30066, the installation is affected.Affected if Classic version 17.x is between 17.0 and 17.011.30066 inclusive.
-
Compare Continuous (Dc) versions against affected rangesFor Dc versions: if version >= 15.0 and <= 15.006.30355, OR version <= 17.012.20098, the installation is affected.Affected if Dc version is between 15.0 and 15.006.30355, or is 17.012.20098 or lower.
A user is affected if the installed Adobe Acrobat or Reader version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges: 11.x versions 11.0.22 or lower, 17.x versions 17.0 through 17.011.30066, Dc 15.x versions 15.0 through 15.006.30355, or Dc 17.x versions 17.012.20098 or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Adobe Acrobat and Reader to the latest versions as released by Adobe. Prioritize systems handling sensitive documents.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16364 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16364 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data