CVE-2017-16372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to untrusted pointer dereference in the JavaScript API engine. In this scenario, the JavaScript input is crafted in way that the computation results with pointer to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result with sensitive data exposure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat and Reader's JavaScript API engine allows specially crafted JavaScript to read sensitive data from memory locations outside the process address space. The vulnerability results in information disclosure via an out-of-bounds read operation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe product and versionOpen Adobe Acrobat or Reader, then go to Help > About (or About Adobe Acrobat/Reader). Alternatively, on Windows, check the version in the executable properties of AcroRd32.exe (Reader) or Acrobat.exe (Pro). On macOS, control-click the application and select Get Info.Affected if The displayed version falls within these ranges: Acrobat/Reader <= 11.0.22; 17.0 to 17.011.30066; 15.0 to 15.006.30355; or Acrobat/Reader Dc <= 17.012.20098. Version 17.x and 15.x use the 'Dc' naming (e.g., 17.012.20098, 15.006.30355).
-
Verify JavaScript is enabled in the applicationIn Adobe Reader/Acrobat, go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript. Confirm the 'Enable Adobe JavaScript' checkbox is checked. On the same screen, verify if 'Enable global security settings for script APIs' is unchecked, which may also affect exposure.Affected if JavaScript is enabled, as the vulnerability exploits the JavaScript API engine. If JavaScript is disabled entirely, the attack surface is reduced.
-
Check for PDF files with embedded JavaScriptUse a PDF analysis tool or open suspicious PDF files in the application. Inspect the document using the 'Extend Features' or 'Analyze Document' tools to see if JavaScript actions are present (e.g., app.docomenu, app.alert, or custom scripts in document-level JavaScript).Affected if The document contains embedded JavaScript. While this check does not confirm vulnerability, it identifies documents that could trigger the flaw if opened in a vulnerable version.
You are affected if you run Adobe Acrobat or Reader versions 11.0.22 or lower, versions 15.0 through 15.006.30355, versions 17.0 through 17.011.30066, or Dc versions 17.012.20098 or lower, AND JavaScript is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Adobe Acrobat and Reader to the latest versions beyond the affected releases (2017.012.20098, 2017.011.30066, 2015.006.30355, and 11.0.22).
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data