CVE-2017-16395
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. The vulnerability is caused by a buffer access with an incorrect length value in the image conversion module when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF). Crafted EMF input (EMR_STRETCHDIBITS) causes a mismatch between allocated buffer size and the access allowed by the computation. If an attacker can adequately control the accessible memory then this vulnerability can be leveraged to achieve arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat and Reader's image conversion module when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF) files. Specifically, the EMR_STRETCHDIBITS record handling causes a mismatch between allocated buffer size and the memory access permitted by the length computation, allowing controlled memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Adobe Acrobat or Reader is installedOn Windows, check for installation in Program Files/Adobe or use the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Adobe. On Mac, check /Applications for Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Reader.Affected if Neither Adobe Acrobat nor Adobe Reader is installed, then the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability.
-
Determine the installed Adobe product versionIn Adobe Acrobat: go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat. In Adobe Reader: go to Help > About Adobe Reader. The version number appears in the format XX.x.xxxxxxx (e.g., 17.011.30066).Affected if The product is Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Reader but the version cannot be determined.
-
Compare against affected versions for standard Acrobat/ReaderFor Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader (non-DC): affected if version <= 11.0.22 OR version >= 17.0 and <= 17.011.30066. The 11.0.x branch and 17.x branch up to 17.011.30066 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: <= 11.0.22 or >= 17.0 through 17.011.30066.
-
Compare against affected versions for Acrobat/Reader DCFor Adobe Acrobat DC and Adobe Reader DC: affected if version >= 15.0 and <= 15.006.30355 OR version >= 15.0 and <= 17.012.20098. Note: there are two distinct vulnerable ranges in the DC branch.Affected if The installed DC version falls within: 15.0 through 15.006.30355, or 15.0 through 17.012.20098.
-
Verify if EMF file processing is possibleThe vulnerability triggers when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF) files through the image conversion module. Attempt to open or convert a specially crafted EMF file through the application to confirm the vulnerable code path is reachable.Affected if EMF files can be processed by the application and the version is within the affected ranges listed above.
A system is affected if Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Reader is installed with a version matching the specified vulnerable ranges and the application can process EMF files, which is standard functionality in these products.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Adobe Acrobat and Reader to patched versions beyond 2017.012.20098, 2017.011.30066, 2015.006.30355, and 11.0.22. Until patched, consider blocking or sandboxing EMF file processing from untrusted sources.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16395 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data