CVE-2017-16415
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. The vulnerability is caused by a computation that writes data past the end of the intended buffer; the computation is a part of the functionality that handles font encodings. The vulnerability is a result of out of range pointer offset that is used to access sub-elements of an internal data structure. An attacker can potentially leverage the vulnerability to corrupt sensitive data or execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat and Reader's font encoding handling functionality caused by an out-of-range pointer offset that accesses sub-elements of an internal data structure, allowing potential arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355<= 11.0.22>= 17.0, <= 17.011.30066>= -, <= 17.012.20098>= 15.0, <= 15.006.30355CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe productOpen Adobe Acrobat or Reader, then go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat (or Reader) to display the exact version number. Alternatively, check Programs and Features in Control Panel for the installed version.Affected if Any version of Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Acrobat Reader is installed
-
Determine exact version numberNote the full version string shown in the About dialog (e.g., 17.011.30066 or 15.006.30355). The version format is major.minor.patch.build (e.g., 17.0.22.XXXXX).Affected if The exact four-part version number cannot be determined
-
Compare Acrobat version to affected rangesIf using Adobe Acrobat (not Reader DC), compare your version against: 11.0.22 or earlier; OR 17.0 through 17.011.30066 inclusive. Versions 11.0.23 and later, 17.011.30067 and later are fixed.Affected if Acrobat version is 11.0.22 or earlier, OR between 17.0 and 17.011.30066 inclusive
-
Compare Acrobat DC version to affected rangesIf using Adobe Acrobat DC, compare your version against: 15.0 through 15.006.30355 inclusive; OR up to 17.012.20098. Versions 15.006.30356 and later, 17.012.20099 and later are fixed.Affected if Acrobat DC version is between 15.0 and 15.006.30355 inclusive, OR 17.012.20098 or earlier
-
Compare Reader version to affected rangesIf using Adobe Acrobat Reader (not Reader DC), compare your version against: 11.0.22 or earlier; OR 17.0 through 17.011.30066 inclusive. Versions 11.0.23 and later, 17.011.30067 and later are fixed.Affected if Reader version is 11.0.22 or earlier, OR between 17.0 and 17.011.30066 inclusive
-
Compare Reader DC version to affected rangesIf using Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, compare your version against: 15.0 through 15.006.30355 inclusive; OR up to 17.012.20098. Versions 15.006.30356 and later, 17.012.20099 and later are fixed.Affected if Reader DC version is between 15.0 and 15.006.30355 inclusive, OR 17.012.20098 or earlier
A defender is affected if any installed Adobe Acrobat or Reader version falls within the listed vulnerable ranges, regardless of configuration, since the font encoding handling is a built-in feature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor security patches: update to versions 2017.012.20099 and later, 2017.011.30067 and later, 2015.006.30356 and later, or 11.0.23 and later.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16415 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16415 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data