CVE-2017-1651
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 133261.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management versions 5.0-5.0.2 and 6.0-6.0.5 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Attackers can embed arbitrary JavaScript code through the Web UI, potentially altering application functionality and allowing credential disclosure via session hijacking within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 6.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.0.3= 6.0.4= 6.0.5= 5.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 6.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.0.3= 6.0.4= 6.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product versionAccess the Web UI administration or About page for IBM Rational Quality Manager or Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management. Navigate to the server info or about section in the Jazz team server administration console to retrieve the exact version number.Affected if The installed version matches 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4, or 6.0.5.
-
Confirm Web UI is enabledVerify that the Web UI interface is accessible and users can submit content through web forms. This includes test artifact creation, requirement entries, or comment fields where user-supplied data is stored.Affected if The Web UI is accessible and allows users to input content that is persisted and displayed back to other users.
-
Check for recent security patchesReview the IBM Fix Central or the installed interim fixes list within the IBM Installation Manager to determine if security fixes after version 5.0.2 or 6.0.5 have been applied.Affected if No post-5.0.2 or post-6.0.5 security patches addressing XSS have been installed.
The environment is affected if IBM Rational Quality Manager or Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management is running versions 5.0 through 6.0.5 inclusive and the Web UI is accessible without additional output encoding protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM's vendor patches for versions 5.0.2 and 6.0.5. Implement output encoding and input validation for user-supplied content in web interfaces as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1651 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1651 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data