BuildmasterApplication · Inedo

CVE-2017-16521

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-11-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.8.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Inedo BuildMaster before 5.8.2, XslTransform was used where XslCompiledTransform should have been used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Inedo BuildMaster before version 5.8.2 uses the insecure XslTransform class for XSLT transformations instead of the safer XslCompiledTransform. XslTransform is known to be vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) injection attacks and other XML processing vulnerabilities due to insecure default settings.

MitigationUpgrade Inedo BuildMaster to version 5.8.2 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable external entity resolution in XML processors and implement input validation for XSLT transformations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BuildmasterApplication
Affected:< 5.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check BuildMaster version
    Locate the BuildMaster installation directory and find the version information. This is typically in an about page, a version file, or the installer metadata. On Windows, check the program files directory or service properties.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 5.8.2 (any 5.x version below 5.8.2, or any version prior to the 5.x series)
  2. Verify XSLT transformation feature usage
    Check if BuildMaster is configured to process XSLT transformations. Look for XSLT-related handlers, agents, or extension configurations in the BuildMaster web UI under administration or in configuration files.
    Affected if XSLT transformation features, custom handlers, or XML processing extensions are enabled or configured in BuildMaster
  3. Inspect XML processor configuration
    Examine BuildMaster configuration files (typically in the config or settings directories) for XML processing settings. Look for configurations that involve XslTransform class usage or XML transformation rules.
    Affected if Configuration files contain XslTransform references or insecure XML processing settings that enable external entity resolution
  4. Check for custom extension or handler deployments
    Review any custom extensions, plugins, or handlers deployed to the BuildMaster instance. Check the extensions directory for DLLs or scripts that perform XML or XSLT processing.
    Affected if Custom extensions or handlers that perform XSLT transformations are deployed to the BuildMaster instance

You are affected if BuildMaster version is earlier than 5.8.2 AND the XSLT transformation feature or custom XML processing extensions are in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.8.2 or later
Fixed in 5.8.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Inedo BuildMaster to version 5.8.2 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable external entity resolution in XML processors and implement input validation for XSLT transformations.

Recommended fix High confidence

BuildMaster 5.8.2 or later

  1. Upgrade Inedo BuildMaster to version 5.8.2 or later to remediate the insecure XslTransform usage vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Buildmaster Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16521 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16521 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data