Enterprise ManagerApplication · Netgain Systems

CVE-2017-16602

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-01-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of NetGain Systems Enterprise Manager 7.2.730 build 1034. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the org.apache.jsp.u.jsp.tools.exec_jsp servlet, which listens on TCP port 8081 by default. When parsing the command parameter, the process does not properly validate a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of Administrator. Was ZDI-CAN-5193.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Command injection vulnerability in NetGain Systems Enterprise Manager's exec_jsp servlet (TCP port 8081). The command parameter is not validated before being used in a system call, allowing authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code. The authentication mechanism can be bypassed, making remote code execution possible.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on the command parameter, restrict access to port 8081 via network segmentation, and apply vendor patches if available. Consider disabling the exec_jsp servlet if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise ManagerApplication
Affected:= 7.2.730

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify NetGain Enterprise Manager installation
    Check for the NetGain installation directory, look for the 'Enterprise Manager' service/process running, or scan for TCP port 8081 listening on the system using 'netstat -an | grep 8081' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 8081'
    Affected if NetGain Enterprise Manager is installed and port 8081 is listening
  2. Verify the installed version
    Locate version information in the NetGain installation - common paths include version files, about pages, or the main JAR/WAR file properties. Check the 'manager' or 'web' subdirectory for version indicators
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.2.730
  3. Confirm exec_jsp endpoint accessibility
    Send an HTTP GET or POST request to http://target:8081/exec_jsp or the JSP endpoint path on port 8081 and observe if the servlet responds
    Affected if The exec_jsp servlet responds to HTTP requests (indicates the vulnerable endpoint is enabled)
  4. Assess network exposure of port 8081
    Review firewall rules, network segmentation, and ACLs to determine if port 8081 is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if Port 8081 is exposed to networks outside the trusted administrative zone

The environment is affected if NetGain Enterprise Manager version 7.2.730 is installed with the exec_jsp servlet on port 8081 accessible from an attacker's network location.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation on the command parameter, restrict access to port 8081 via network segmentation, and apply vendor patches if available. Consider disabling the exec_jsp servlet if not required.

Fix this in Enterprise Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16602 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data