CVE-2017-16900
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Access Control in Hunesion i-oneNet 3.0.6042.1200 allows the local user to access other user's information which is unauthorized via brute force.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect Access Control vulnerability in Hunesion i-oneNet 3.0.6042.1200 allows authenticated local users to access unauthorized information belonging to other users through brute force enumeration. This appears to be an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or inadequate authorization check that fails to properly validate user permissions before granting access to data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.6042.1200CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product versionIdentify the installed version of Hunesion I Onenet by checking the application about page, system information, or installation directory for version metadata matching 3.0.6042.1200Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.0.6042.1200
-
Verify user data access controlsReview the application source code or configuration to determine if user-specific data endpoints validate session user identity against the requested resource owner before returning dataAffected if The application lacks server-side validation that the authenticated user has permission to access the requested user data
-
Check for IDOR protectionTest accessing another user's data by manipulating user identifiers (such as sequential IDs in URLs or API parameters) while authenticated as a standard userAffected if The application returns data belonging to other users without proper authorization verification
-
Inspect brute force protectionsReview application or web server configuration for rate limiting, account lockout thresholds, or request throttling that would limit enumeration attemptsAffected if No rate limiting or lockout mechanisms exist to slow or block repeated unauthorized data access attempts
You are affected if running Hunesion I Onenet version 3.0.6042.1200 and the application allows authenticated users to access other users' data by manipulating user identifiers without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper server-side authorization checks to verify the requesting user has permission to access the requested data, combined with rate limiting and account lockout mechanisms to prevent brute force enumeration attacks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16900 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16900 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data