CVE-2017-17067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSplunk Web in Splunk Enterprise 7.0.x before 7.0.0.1, 6.6.x before 6.6.3.2, 6.5.x before 6.5.6, 6.4.x before 6.4.9, and 6.3.x before 6.3.12, when the SAML authType is enabled, mishandles SAML, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or conduct impersonation attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAML authentication bypass vulnerability in Splunk Web where improper handling of SAML assertions when authType is enabled allows remote attackers to bypass authentication controls or impersonate legitimate users, achieving CRITICAL impact via network-exploitable unauthenticated attack vector.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.12>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.9>= 6.5.0, < 6.5.6>= 6.6.0, < 6.6.3.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Splunk versionRun 'splunk version' from the Splunk installation directory or check the $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk.version fileAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 6.3.0 to 6.3.11, 6.4.0 to 6.4.8, 6.5.0 to 6.5.5, 6.6.0 to 6.6.3.1, or 7.0.0
-
Confirm Splunk Web is enabledCheck the web.conf configuration file in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/ for enabled = 1 under [settings] stanza, or inspect the running Splunk process list for splunkwebAffected if Splunk Web interface is active and accessible on the configured port (default 8000)
-
Verify SAML authentication is configuredExamine the authentication.conf file in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/ for authType = SAML in the [authentication] stanza, or check web.conf for authHandlerv2 = SAMLAffected if SAML authentication is enabled with authType parameter configured
-
Check for SAML IdP configurationReview the $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/ directory for saml.conf or look at the authentication.conf to identify the SAML identity provider settingsAffected if SAML IdP is configured and mapped to Splunk users or groups
You are affected if your Splunk version is within the vulnerable ranges AND Splunk Web with SAML authentication (authType) is enabled and configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3.126.4.96.5.6
Apply vendor-supplied patches for affected versions (7.0.0.1+, 6.6.3.2+, 6.5.6+, 6.4.9+, 6.3.12+) and validate SAML authentication behavior post-patch; if patching is delayed, consider restricting SAML-enabled endpoints or implementing additional access controls.
Upgrade to 6.3.12 (if on 6.3.x), 6.4.9 (if on 6.4.x), 6.5.6 (if on 6.5.x), or 6.6.3.2 (if on 6.6.x). For long-term stability, consider upgrading to the latest 6.6.x or 7.0.x release which includes the fix.
- 1. Review Splunk upgrade documentation and ensure compatibility with your current environment and add-ons
- 2. Back up your Splunk configuration directory ($SPLUNK_HOME/etc/) and any custom apps
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version for your current branch: 6.3.12 for 6.3.x, 6.4.9 for 6.4.x, 6.5.6 for 6.5.x, or 6.6.3.2 for 6.6.x
- 4. Stop the Splunk service using: $SPLUNK_HOME/bin/splunk stop
- 5. Install the upgrade package for your target fixed version
- 6. Start the Splunk service using: $SPLUNK_HOME/bin/splunk start
- 7. After upgrade, verify SAML authentication is working correctly by logging in via SAML
- 8. Confirm the Splunk Web version reflects the patched release: Settings > About > Version information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data