Ocaml BatteriesApplication · Ocaml Batteries Project

CVE-2017-17519

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-12-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
batteriesConfig.mlp in OCaml Batteries Included (aka ocaml-batteries) 2.6 does not validate strings before launching the program specified by the BROWSER environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to conduct argument-injection attacks via a crafted URL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The batteriesConfig.mlp module in OCaml Batteries Included 2.6 uses the BROWSER environment variable to launch a web browser without validating input strings, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary arguments into the browser command through crafted URLs.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization for any strings used with the BROWSER environment variable, and use an allowlist approach for permitted browser arguments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ocaml BatteriesApplication
Affected:= 2.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed version of OCaml Batteries
    Run 'ocamlfind query batteries' or check the package manager (opam list batteries, apt list libbatteries-ocaml, etc.) to determine the installed version of the batteries package
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.6.0 or 2.6 (no patch version)
  2. Locate the batteriesConfig.mlp module
    Search for the file batteriesConfig.mlp in the OCaml batteries library path, typically found in the installation directory (e.g., opam share batteries/include/batteriesConfig.mlp or similar)
    Affected if The batteriesConfig.mlp file exists in the installed package and contains code that reads the BROWSER environment variable
  3. Check for BROWSER environment variable usage
    Examine the batteriesConfig.mlp source code (if accessible) or run 'grep -r BROWSER' within the batteries library files to identify where the BROWSER environment variable is read
    Affected if Code in the module reads the BROWSER environment variable without sanitization
  4. Identify code paths that invoke browsers using this module
    Search for function calls that execute external commands using the BROWSER variable, such as Sys.command, Unix.exec, or similar execution functions within or dependent on batteriesConfig.mlp
    Affected if The application or library code uses the BROWSER variable from this module to launch a web browser
  5. Verify external input can reach the BROWSER variable
    Review application code that calls the batteriesConfig module to determine if user-controlled or remote input (such as URLs) can influence the browser command string
    Affected if Remote or untrusted input (e.g., URLs from external sources) can be passed to the browser launching function without validation

A user is affected if OCaml Batteries version 2.6 is installed AND the batteriesConfig.mlp module is used to launch a browser with the BROWSER environment variable AND external/remote input can reach that browser command without validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization for any strings used with the BROWSER environment variable, and use an allowlist approach for permitted browser arguments.

Fix this in Ocaml Batteries Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17519 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data