AbiwordApplication · Abisource

CVE-2017-17529

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-12-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
af/util/xp/ut_go_file.cpp in AbiWord 3.0.2-2 does not validate strings before launching the program specified by the BROWSER environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to conduct argument-injection attacks via a crafted URL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

AbiWord 3.0.2-2 contains an argument injection vulnerability in af/util/xp/ut_go_file.cpp. The code uses the BROWSER environment variable to determine which browser to launch but fails to validate or sanitize the URL parameter before passing it to the system call, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary arguments via a crafted URL.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of AbiWord that properly validates URLs before launching the browser, or implement input sanitization to prevent argument injection in the ut_go_file.cpp code path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AbiwordApplication
Affected:= 3.0.2-2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify AbiWord is installed
    Run 'abiword --version' or check your package manager for installed AbiWord packages
    Affected if AbiWord is not installed - not vulnerable. If installed, continue to version check.
  2. Determine installed AbiWord version
    Run 'abiword --version' and note the version number displayed
    Affected if Version is exactly 3.0.2-2 - vulnerable. Versions may vary; compare against the affected range.
  3. Check if the vulnerable file exists
    Locate ut_go_file.cpp in the AbiWord source or installed files, typically in af/util/xp/ or the source tree under af/util/xp/
    Affected if File exists and contains code using the BROWSER environment variable without URL validation - potentially vulnerable.
  4. Inspect BROWSER environment variable usage
    Run 'env | grep BROWSER' to see if BROWSER is set, and trace code path in ut_go_file.cpp where it executes browser commands
    Affected if BROWSER variable is set and ut_go_file.cpp passes URLs to system calls without sanitization - vulnerable to argument injection.
  5. Verify URL handling in the code path
    Examine the function in ut_go_file.cpp that handles URL parameters and check if it validates or sanitizes the URL before passing to the browser command
    Affected if URL parameter is passed directly to system call without validation - vulnerable to crafted URL injection.

You are affected if AbiWord version 3.0.2-2 is installed and the application uses the BROWSER environment variable to open URLs without validating the URL parameter, allowing arbitrary argument injection via crafted URLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of AbiWord that properly validates URLs before launching the browser, or implement input sanitization to prevent argument injection in the ut_go_file.cpp code path.

Fix this in Abiword Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17529 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17529 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data