CVE-2017-17785
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn GIMP 2.8.22, there is a heap-based buffer overflow in the fli_read_brun function in plug-ins/file-fli/fli.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in GIMP 2.8.22's FLI animation file parser. The fli_read_brun function in plug-ins/file-fli/fli.c does not properly validate bounds when reading compressed FLI/FLC animation frames, allowing a specially crafted malicious FLI file to overflow the heap buffer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 14.04= 2.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if GIMP is installedRun 'gimp --version' or 'dpkg -l | grep gimp' (Debian/Ubuntu) to determine if GIMP is present on the systemAffected if GIMP is not installed, the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Determine the installed GIMP versionExecute 'gimp --version' to retrieve the exact version number, or use package manager commands like 'apt-cache policy gimp' on Debian/UbuntuAffected if The installed version is exactly 2.8.22, which matches the vulnerable version listed in the affected products
-
Verify the FLI/FLC file plugin existsCheck for the presence of the file-fli plugin by searching for 'fli.c' or the compiled plugin in GIMP's plugin directory, typically found at /usr/lib/gimp/*/plug-ins/file-fli/ or similar pathAffected if The FLI plugin binary exists and corresponds to the vulnerable 2.8.22 version codebase
-
Confirm the system OS matches affected distributionsCheck the OS version with 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'lsb_release -a' to confirm if the system is Debian 7.0, 8.0, or 9.0, or Ubuntu 14.04Affected if The system runs one of the explicitly listed affected OS versions with the vulnerable GIMP version installed
A system is affected if GIMP version 2.8.22 is installed (or the specific vulnerable codebase) and the FLI/FLC animation file plugin is present on a Debian 7.0/8.0/9.0 or Ubuntu 14.04 system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade GIMP to a version newer than 2.8.22 that contains the patch for this vulnerability. Avoid opening untrusted FLI/FLC animation files in GIMP until the update is applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17785 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17785 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data