ConfluenceApplication · Atlassian

CVE-2017-18085

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-02-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.6.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The viewdefaultdecorator resource in Atlassian Confluence Server before version 6.6.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability through the key parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Atlassian Confluence Server. The vulnerability exists in the viewdefaultdecorator resource where the 'key' parameter is not properly sanitized before being rendered in the response, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious HTML or JavaScript that executes in the context of other users' browsers.

MitigationUpgrade Confluence Server to version 6.6.1 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrading is not possible, implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to sanitize the key parameter and block malicious payloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConfluenceApplication
Affected:< 6.6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Confluence version
    Log into Confluence as an administrator and navigate to Confluence Admin > Configuration > About Confluence, or check the startup logs for the version number
    Affected if The displayed version is below 6.6.1 (e.g., 6.5.x, 6.4.x, etc.)
  2. Locate the version from the file system
    Check the file <confluence-install>/confluence/WEB-INF/lib/confluence-*.jar for the version in the filename, or examine the build number in <confluence-install>/confluence/version.properties
    Affected if The version file or JAR name indicates a build prior to version 6.6.1
  3. Verify the vulnerable endpoint is accessible
    Confirm the /viewdefaultdecorator.action endpoint is reachable. This can be tested by accessing a URL such as http(s)://<your-confluence-host>/viewdefaultdecorator.action in a browser. Note: This does not confirm exploitation, only accessibility
    Affected if The endpoint responds successfully (HTTP 200) and the Confluence version is below 6.6.1
  4. Check for existing XSS payloads in decorator configurations
    Review the database table PLUGINDATA or similar storage for any suspicious content in the 'key' parameter values. This requires database access and knowledge of Confluence's storage schema
    Affected if Unexpected HTML or JavaScript code is found stored in decorator-related configuration records

You are affected if your Confluence Server version is below 6.6.1 and the viewdefaultdecorator endpoint is accessible to users who could inject malicious content via the key parameter.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.6.1 or later
Fixed in 6.6.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Confluence Server to version 6.6.1 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrading is not possible, implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to sanitize the key parameter and block malicious payloads.

Fix this in Confluence Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18085 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data