CVE-2017-18100
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe agile wallboard gadget in Atlassian Jira before version 7.8.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the name of quick filters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe agile wallboard gadget in Atlassian Jira before version 7.8.1 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Attackers can inject malicious HTML or JavaScript into the name field of quick filters, which then executes when other users view the affected wallboard.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Jira versionNavigate to Jira administration > Applications > Jira software or access /rest/api/2/serverInfo endpoint to retrieve the installed Jira version numberAffected if The installed version is any release before 7.8.1 (e.g., 7.8.0, 7.7.x, 7.6.x, etc.)
-
Identify agile wallboard usageReview project dashboards and check if any dashboards contain the 'Agile Wallboard' gadget. Look for dashboards with the wallboard gadget added in the project or global contextAffected if The agile wallboard gadget is present on any dashboard in the Jira instance
-
Inspect quick filter configurationsAccess any active wallboard gadget, click on the quick filters panel, and examine the names assigned to quick filters. Check for any unusually named filters containing HTML tags, script elements, or javascript: URIsAffected if Any quick filter name contains raw HTML, script tags, or suspicious JavaScript code that was not escaped when rendered
The environment is affected if Jira version is below 7.8.1 AND the agile wallboard gadget with quick filters is in use, regardless of whether malicious content is currently observable in the filter names.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.8.1
Upgrade Jira to version 7.8.1 or later to patch the XSS vulnerability in the agile wallboard gadget's quick filter name parameter.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18100 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18100 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data