CVE-2017-18136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before security patch level 2018-04-05 on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, in the omx aac component, a Use After Free condition may potentially occur.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Use After Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the OMX AAC (OpenMAX Advanced Audio Coding) component of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors. This memory corruption flaw allows attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code by exploiting freed memory that is still being referenced, leading to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use commands like `cat /proc/cpuinfo` on Android, or check the device's technical documentation to determine the exact Snapdragon chipset (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, or Sd 210)Affected if The device uses any of the listed affected chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210)
-
Check the Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to Settings > About Phone > Software Information and view the 'Security patch level', or use `getprop ro.build.version.security_patch` via ADBAffected if The security patch level is earlier than April 2018 (the fix was released in the April 2018 Android Security Bulletin)
-
Check the baseband firmware versionUse `getprop` commands via ADB (e.g., `getprop ro.baseband`, `getprop gsm.version.baseband`) or check in Settings > About Phone > Mobile Network InformationAffected if The baseband firmware version corresponds to an unpatched release before the April 2018 Qualcomm security update
-
Verify if OMX AAC decoder is in useCheck if the device uses the OpenMAX (OMX) AAC audio decoding component by monitoring audio sessions or reviewing audio HAL configuration files in /vendor/etc/ or /system/etc/Affected if The device actively uses the OMX AAC decoder component - this is the vulnerable component where the UAF occurs
The device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210) AND has a security patch level before April 2018.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the April 2018 or later security patch level for affected Android devices. Since this is a firmware-level vulnerability in Snapdragon chipsets, users must rely on OEM-provided OTA updates. Organizations should identify and track all affected devices in their fleet.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (contact device manufacturer for specific firmware versions)
- Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- If the device shows a date before April 2018, check with the device manufacturer or carrier for an available update that includes the April 2018 security patch level
- Apply the OTA update or firmware update containing the 2018-04-05 security patch or later
- Verify after update that the Security Patch Level reflects April 2018 or newer
- For end-of-life devices that cannot receive official updates, consider device replacement as no further vendor patches are expected for this vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data