CVE-2017-18280
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Snapdragon (Automobile, Mobile, Wear) in version MDM9607, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SDM429, SDM439, SDM632, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, when a Trusted Application has opened the SPI/I2C interface to a particular device, it is possible for another Trusted Application to read the data on this open interface by calling the SPI/I2C read function.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Snapdragon's Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) allows one Trusted Application to read SPI/I2C interface data that was opened by another Trusted Application, due to improper isolation between TAs within the TEE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device or system for the specific chipset: Mdm9607, Msm8909w, Msm8996au, Sd210, Sd212, Sd205, Sd425, or Sd427. This can be done via /proc/cpuinfo, kernel boot logs, or system information files.Affected if The device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9607, Msm8909w, Msm8996au, Sd210, Sd212, Sd205, Sd425, Sd427). All firmware versions of these chipsets are affected.
-
Verify the Trusted Execution Environment is presentCheck for TEE support in the kernel: look for tee kernel module (lsmod | grep tee), check for TEE device nodes (ls /dev/tz* or /dev/tee*), or verify TEE subsystem in /sys/kernel/debug/tee/.Affected if The device has an active TEE (Trusted Execution Environment). The vulnerability exists within the TEE isolation.
-
Enumerate installed Trusted ApplicationsList all Trusted Applications running in the TEE. This typically requires access to TEE debugging interfaces or vendor-specific tools. Check /tee/ directory or use Qualcomm-specific diagnostic tools if available.Affected if Multiple Trusted Applications (TAs) are installed. The vulnerability allows one TA to read data from interfaces opened by another TA.
-
Identify TAs with SPI/I2C peripheral accessReview TA permissions and capabilities to determine which applications have access to SPI or I2C interfaces. This information may be in TEE configuration files, manifest files, or obtained through vendor diagnostic tools.Affected if Two or more Trusted Applications have access to SPI or I2C interfaces. The flaw enables unauthorized data reading between TAs sharing these peripheral interfaces.
-
Check for simultaneous TA access to shared peripheralsMonitor or review the configuration to determine if multiple TAs can concurrently access the same SPI or I2C bus resources. This requires understanding the TEE scheduling and resource allocation.Affected if The TEE allows concurrent access from multiple TAs to SPI/I2C interfaces without proper isolation between them.
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (all firmware versions) AND has multiple Trusted Applications where at least two of them access SPI or I2C interfaces, allowing one TA to read data intended for another.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates from Qualcomm/device manufacturers to patch the TEE isolation flaw. Until patch is available, minimize use of multiple TAs that access sensitive SPI/I2C peripherals.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18280 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data