CVE-2017-2344
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA routine within an internal Junos OS sockets library is vulnerable to a buffer overflow. Malicious exploitation of this issue may lead to a denial of service (kernel panic) or be leveraged as a privilege escalation through local code execution. The routines are only accessible via programs running on the device itself, and veriexec restricts arbitrary programs from running on Junos OS. There are no known exploit vectors utilizing signed binaries shipped with Junos OS itself. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.1X46 prior to 12.1X46-D67; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D51, 12.3X48-D55; 13.3 prior to 13.3R10-S2; 14.1 prior to 14.1R2-S10, 14.1R8-S4, 14.1R9; 14.1X50 prior to 14.1X50-D185; 14.1X53 prior to 14.1X53-D122, 14.1X53-D45, 14.1X53-D50; 14.2 prior to 14.2R4-S9, 14.2R7-S7, 14.2R8; 15.1 prior to 15.1F2-S18, 15.1F6-S7, 15.1R4-S8, 15.1R5-S5, 15.1R6-S1, 15.1R7; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D100; 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D231, 15.1X53-D47, 15.1X53-D48, 15.1X53-D57, 15.1X53-D64, 15.1X53-D70; 16.1 prior to 16.1R3-S4, 16.1R4-S3, 16.1R4-S4, 16.1R5; 16.2 prior to 16.2R2; 17.1 prior to 17.1R1-S3, 17.1R2; 17.2 prior to 17.2R1-S1, 17.2R2; 17.2X75 prior to 17.2X75-D30. No other Juniper Networks products or platforms are affected by this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in an internal Junos OS sockets library routine. Exploitation can cause kernel panic (denial of service) or enable privilege escalation through local code execution. However, exploitation is constrained because the vulnerable routines are only accessible by programs running on the device itself, and Junos OS's veriexec mechanism restricts arbitrary program execution. No exploit vectors using signed Junos binaries are known.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1x46= 12.3x48= 13.3= 14.1= 14.1x50= 14.1x53= 14.2= 15.1= 15.1x49= 15.1x53= 16.1= 16.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' on the device CLI to display the installed Junos OS version and build numberAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected branches: 12.1X46, 12.3X48, 13.3, 14.1, 14.1X50, 14.1X53, 14.2, 15.1, 15.1X49, 15.1X53, 16.1, or 16.2, and the build is earlier than the fixed patch level (12.1X46-D67+, 12.3X48-D51+, 13.3R10-S2+, etc.)
-
Identify patch levelExecute 'show system software' or 'show version detail' to view the installed Junos patch level and compare against the fixed versions listed in the CVE advisoryAffected if The installed patch level is lower than the vendor-supplied patches for your version branch (e.g., below D67 for 12.1X46, below D51 for 12.3X48, etc.)
-
Verify if vulnerable socket library module is presentThis is an internal library component; the primary indicator is the version/patch level checked above, as the specific sockets library routine is not user-accessible for inspectionAffected if Version and patch status matches the affected but unpatched condition from steps 1 and 2
-
Confirm local execution contextReview audit logs and verify that no unauthorized local programs have been installed on the device using 'file list' or similar commands to check for unexpected binaries in /var/tmp or other local directoriesAffected if Unexpected local programs exist on the device, as exploitation requires local code execution to reach the vulnerable internal sockets library routines
The device is affected if it runs an unpatched Junos version from the 12.1X46, 12.3X48, 13.3, 14.1, 14.1X50, 14.1X53, 14.2, 15.1, 15.1X49, 15.1X53, 16.1, or 16.2 branches that has not received the vendor-supplied security patches.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied Junos OS patches for affected versions (12.1X46-D67+, 12.3X48-D51+, 13.3R10-S2+, etc.) after assessing current version and planning appropriate maintenance window.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,624.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2344 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data