CVE-2017-2580
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in netpbm before 10.61. A maliciously crafted file could cause the application to crash or possibly allow code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in netpbm versions before 10.61. When processing a maliciously crafted image file, the application writes data beyond the allocated buffer boundaries, potentially allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory and achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.61.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify netpbm installationRun 'netpbm --version' or 'pamversion' from the command line to retrieve the installed netpbm version. If using a package manager, query the installed package version with 'dpkg -l netpbm' (Debian-based) or 'rpm -qi netpbm' (RHEL-based).Affected if The command fails to return a version or shows no netpbm package installed, indicating netpbm may not be present or was installed via a non-standard method.
-
Compare version against affected rangeExamine the version number returned from the previous step. Note that versions before 10.61.00 are affected. If the version shows 10.61.00 exactly, verify whether it is the patched release by checking release notes or consulting your distribution's security advisories.Affected if The installed version is 10.60.x, 10.59.x, or any version number lower than 10.61.00.
-
Identify active netpbm utilitiesList all installed netpbm binaries in standard locations such as /usr/bin/, /usr/local/bin/, or via 'which' for commands like 'pnmtopng', 'pngtopam', 'giftopnm', or other image conversion tools. Run 'ls /usr/bin/*pnm* /usr/bin/*pam* /usr/bin/*gif* /usr/bin/*png* 2>/dev/null' to enumerate image processing utilities.Affected if Netpbm image processing utilities are installed and accessible on the system.
-
Assess image processing exposureDetermine whether the netpbm utilities are used in automated workflows, web services, or scripts that process image files from untrusted sources. Check configuration files, cron jobs, or application integrations that invoke netpbm commands.Affected if Netpbm is used to process image files from external or untrusted sources, or is exposed via web-facing applications.
If the installed netpbm version is before 10.61.00 and the system processes image files (particularly from untrusted sources) using netpbm utilities, the environment is affected by CVE-2017-2580.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate netpbm to version 10.61 or later. Until then, avoid processing untrusted or potentially malicious image files with netpbm utilities.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2580 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data