Jboss Bpm SuiteApplication · Redhat

CVE-2017-2674

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-07-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.4.3 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
JBoss BRMS 6 and BPM Suite 6 before 6.4.3 are vulnerable to a stored XSS via several lists in Business Central. The flaw is due to lack of sanitation of user input when creating new lists. Remote, authenticated attackers that have privileges to create lists can store scripts in them, which are not properly sanitized before showing to other users, including admins.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

JBoss BRMS 6 and BPM Suite 6 before 6.4.3 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in Business Central. Authenticated users with privileges to create lists can inject malicious scripts through user input that is not properly sanitized before being displayed to other users, including administrators.

MitigationUpgrade to JBoss BRMS/BPM Suite 6.4.3 or later which contains the fix. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in Business Central list creation functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jboss Bpm SuiteApplication
Affected:>= 6.0.0, < 6.4.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify JBoss BRMS/BPM Suite installation
    Locate the JBoss installation directory and check for BRMS or BPM Suite components. Look for business-central war files or check the application server's deployed applications.
    Affected if JBoss BRMS or BPM Suite 6 is installed and running
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the version of JBoss BRMS/BPM Suite. This is typically found in the product's manifest, version file, or in the administration console. Common locations include the product's documentation directory or the deployed business-central web application.
    Affected if The installed version is >= 6.0.0 and < 6.4.3
  3. Verify Business Central is accessible
    Confirm that the Business Central web interface is deployed and accessible. Access the Business Central URL (typically at /business-central) and verify you can log in with an authenticated account.
    Affected if Business Central is deployed and accessible via web interface
  4. Check for list creation privileges
    Review user permissions in Business Central administration. Determine if the current user or any user account has privileges to create or edit lists within Business Central.
    Affected if Authenticated users have privileges to create or modify lists in Business Central

Your environment is affected if JBoss BRMS or BPM Suite 6.0.0 through 6.4.2 is installed with Business Central accessible to users who have list creation privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.4.3 or later
Fixed in 6.4.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to JBoss BRMS/BPM Suite 6.4.3 or later which contains the fix. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in Business Central list creation functionality.

Fix this in Jboss Bpm Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2674 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2674 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data