CVE-2017-2722
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDP300 V500R002C00,TE60 with software V100R001C01, V100R001C10, V100R003C00, V500R002C00 and V600R006C00,TP3106 with software V100R001C06 and V100R002C00,ViewPoint 9030 with software V100R011C02, V100R011C03,eCNS210_TD with software V100R004C10,eSpace 7950 with software V200R003C00 and V200R003C30,eSpace IAD with software V300R001C07SPCa00 and V300R002C01SPCb00,eSpace U1981 with software V100R001C20, V100R001C30, V200R003C00, V200R003C20 and V200R003C30 have an input validation vulnerability.A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malformed packet and sending it to the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an input validation vulnerability affecting multiple Huawei video conferencing and communication devices (DP300, TE60, TP3106, ViewPoint 9030, eCNS210_TD, eSpace series, eSpace IAD, eSpace U1981). A remote attacker can exploit this by sending malformed packets to the device, potentially causing denial of service or executing arbitrary code due to improper validation of input data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r002c00= v100r001c01= v100r001c10= v100r003c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v100r001c06= v100r002c00= v100r011c02= v100r011c03= v100r004c10= v200r003c00= v200r003c30= v300r001c07spca00= v300r002c01spcb00= v100r001c20= v100r001c30= v200r003c00= v200r003c20= v200r003c30CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify affected Huawei devices in your environmentInventory all Huawei devices on the network, specifically looking for: DP300, TE60, TP3106, ViewPoint 9030, eCNS210_TD, eSpace 7950, eSpace IAD, and eSpace U1981. Use network scans or asset management tools to locate these devices.Affected if Any of these specific model numbers are present in the environment
-
Check firmware version on DP300 devicesAccess the device management interface or use SNMP/CLI to retrieve the firmware version. For DP300, look for version v500r002c00.Affected if Firmware version equals v500r002c00
-
Check firmware version on TE60 devicesAccess the device management interface or use SNMP/CLI to retrieve the firmware version. For TE60, look for versions v100r001c01, v100r001c10, v100r003c00, v500r002c00, or v600r006c00.Affected if Firmware version equals any of: v100r001c01, v100r001c10, v100r003c00, v500r002c00, or v600r006c00
-
Check firmware version on TP3106 and ViewPoint 9030 devicesAccess the device management interface or use SNMP/CLI to retrieve the firmware version. For TP3106 look for v100r001c06 or v100r002c00. For ViewPoint 9030 look for v100r011c02 or v100r011c03.Affected if TP3106 firmware is v100r001c06 or v100r002c00; OR ViewPoint 9030 firmware is v100r011c02 or v100r011c03
-
Check firmware version on eSpace and eCNS210_TD devicesAccess the device management interface or use SNMP/CLI to retrieve the firmware version. eSpace 7950: v200r003c00 or v200r003c30. eSpace IAD: v300r001c07spca00 or v300r002c01spcb00. eSpace U1981: v100r001c20, v100r001c30, v200r003c00, v200r003c20, or v200r003c30. eCNS210_TD: v100r004c10.Affected if Any eSpace or eCNS210_TD device matches the specific versions listed above
You are affected if any Huawei DP300, TE60, TP3106, ViewPoint 9030, eCNS210_TD, eSpace 7950, eSpace IAD, or eSpace U1981 devices in your environment run exactly one of the firmware versions enumerated in the CVE advisory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied firmware updates for the specific affected versions listed in the Huawei security advisory. Until patches are applied, consider network segmentation and filtering to limit exposure to untrusted network paths.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2722 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data