CVE-2017-2738
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVCM5010 with software versions earlier before V100R002C50SPC100 has an authentication bypass vulnerability. This is due to improper implementation of authentication for accessing web pages. An unauthenticated attacker could bypass the authentication by sending a crafted HTTP request. 5010 with software versions earlier before V100R002C50SPC100 has an arbitrary file upload vulnerability. The software does not validate the files that uploaded. An authenticated attacker could upload arbitrary files to the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe VCM5010 video management system has two critical vulnerabilities in versions before V100R002C50SPC100: an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers to access protected web pages via crafted HTTP requests, and an arbitrary file upload flaw enabling authenticated users to upload any file type without validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< v100r002c50spc100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify VCM5010 firmware versionAccess the VCM5010 management console or check the system information page to determine the currently installed firmware version. Compare it against V100R002C50SPC100.Affected if The installed firmware version is any version before V100R002C50SPC100 (for example, V100R002C50SPC050 or earlier).
-
Confirm web management interface accessibilityDetermine whether the VCM5010 web management interface is reachable from network segments that are not trusted or are external. Check firewall rules or network access control lists restricting access to port 80/443 or the custom HTTP/HTTPS ports used by VCM5010.Affected if The web management interface is exposed to untrusted networks without proper access restrictions.
-
Test for authentication bypassSend a crafted HTTP request to a protected page (such as /admin or /config) without providing valid authentication credentials. Observe whether the system grants access to the protected resource.Affected if The system returns protected content or allows access without requiring valid authentication.
-
Verify file upload restrictionsIf you have valid credentials, attempt to upload a file with an extension that should be blocked (such as .exe, .php, or .sh) through the file upload feature. Check whether the system performs any validation on the file type before accepting the upload.Affected if The system accepts and stores files without validating the file type or extensions, allowing potentially malicious file types.
A user is affected if the VCM5010 firmware version is before V100R002C50SPC100 and the management interface is network-accessible, since both the authentication bypass and unrestricted file upload vulnerabilities apply.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to V100R002C50SPC100 or later. Until then, restrict network access to the VCM5010 management interface and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
V100R002C50SPC100
- Obtain the firmware version V100R002C50SPC100 or later from the official Huawei support website (support.huawei.com)
- Log into the VCM5010 device management console with administrator credentials
- Navigate to the System Settings or Administration section of the web interface
- Locate the Firmware Upgrade or Software Update option
- Upload the V100R002C50SPC100 firmware file and initiate the upgrade process
- Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete - do not power off the device during this process
- Restart the VCM5010 device if prompted or required after the upgrade
- Verify the firmware version has been updated to V100R002C50SPC100 or later by checking the system information page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2738 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2738 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data