MarklogicApplication

CVE-2017-2792

CRITICAL · 9.6 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-09-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An exploitable heap corruption vulnerability exists in the iBldDirInfo functionality of Antenna House DMC HTMLFilter used by MarkLogic 8.0-6. A specially crafted xls file can cause a heap corruption resulting in arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious xls file to trigger this vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A heap corruption vulnerability exists in the iBldDirInfo function of Antenna House DMC HTMLFilter (used by MarkLogic 8.0-6). When processing a specially crafted malicious XLS file, the parser corrupts heap memory, potentially allowing an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution.

MitigationRestrict processing of untrusted XLS files and apply vendor security patches or upgrade MarkLogic to a patched version. Network filtering can also reduce exposure by limiting where malicious files can be delivered.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MarklogicApplication
Affected:= 8.0-6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm MarkLogic installation
    Identify if MarkLogic Server is running in the environment by checking for MarkLogic processes (e.g., 'ps -ef | grep -i marklogic' on Linux or checking Windows services) or looking for MarkLogic installation directories.
    Affected if MarkLogic Server is installed and running.
  2. Determine MarkLogic version
    Run the command to retrieve the MarkLogic version, such as 'xdmp:version()' in XQuery, using the admin interface, or checking the MarkLogic installation directory for version files. Compare the installed version against the affected range: 8.0-6 and earlier versions.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.0-6 or any version earlier than 8.0-6.
  3. Verify XLS file processing capability
    Check if the MarkLogic server is configured to accept or process XLS files. This may involve reviewing MarkLogic configuration settings, application logic, or checking for XLS-related transformation or ingestion pipelines.
    Affected if The environment processes or can process XLS files through MarkLogic.
  4. Inspect for anomalous XLS file handling
    Review MarkLogic server logs (typically in the 'Logs' directory under the MarkLogic installation) for errors, crashes, or heap-related messages occurring during XLS file processing. Look for patterns indicating heap corruption or unexpected termination.
    Affected if Logs show heap corruption errors, crashes, or abnormal behavior when processing XLS files.

A user is affected if MarkLogic version 8.0-6 or earlier is installed AND the system processes XLS files, with potential indicators visible in server logs showing corruption or crashes during XLS handling.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict processing of untrusted XLS files and apply vendor security patches or upgrade MarkLogic to a patched version. Network filtering can also reduce exposure by limiting where malicious files can be delivered.

Fix this in Marklogic Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-2792 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-2792 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data