Fortianalyzer FirmwareOperating system · Fortinet

CVE-2017-3126

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Open Redirect vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 5.4.0 through 5.4.2 and FortiManager 5.4.0 through 5.4.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the next parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Open redirect vulnerability in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager versions 5.4.0 through 5.4.2 allows attackers to manipulate the 'next' parameter to redirect users to malicious external sites. While the description mentions code/command execution, the CVSS 6.1 and 'open redirect' classification suggests the primary impact is phishing and credential theft via user redirection.

MitigationUpgrade to FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager version 5.4.3 or later which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement web application firewall rules to validate and sanitize redirect parameters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Fortianalyzer FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.4.0= 5.4.1= 5.4.2
Fortimanager FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.4.0= 5.4.1= 5.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FortiAnalyzer firmware version
    Log into the FortiAnalyzer CLI or GUI and navigate to System Settings > Dashboard > System Information, or run the command 'get system status' in the CLI to retrieve the firmware version.
    Affected if The version listed is 5.4.0, 5.4.1, or 5.4.2.
  2. Identify FortiManager firmware version
    Log into the FortiManager CLI or GUI and navigate to System Settings > Dashboard > System Information, or run the command 'get system status' in the CLI to retrieve the firmware version.
    Affected if The version listed is 5.4.0, 5.4.1, or 5.4.2.
  3. Verify web login interface accessibility
    Access the FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager login page via HTTPS (typically port 443) using a browser. Observe if the login page loads successfully.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible and the device is running an affected version.
  4. Test 'next' parameter for open redirect behavior
    After reaching the login page, inspect the URL for a 'next' parameter. If present, modify the parameter value to an external domain such as 'https://example.com' and observe if the browser redirects to that external site after authentication or page load.
    Affected if The system redirects to the attacker-controlled URL specified in the 'next' parameter instead of validating or blocking it.

A system is affected if it runs FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager firmware version 5.4.0, 5.4.1, or 5.4.2 and the web interface responds to manipulation of the 'next' parameter by redirecting to an external domain.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager version 5.4.3 or later which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement web application firewall rules to validate and sanitize redirect parameters.

Fix this in Fortianalyzer Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3126 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3126 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data