CVE-2017-3515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle User Management component of Oracle E-Business Suite (subcomponent: User Name/Password Management). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5 and 12.2.6. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle User Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle User Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle User Management accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated network attacker can exploit Oracle User Management via HTTP to perform unauthorized update, insert, or delete operations on user data. The attack requires human interaction from a victim (likely a CSRF attack where a legitimate user is tricked into clicking a malicious request). The vulnerability affects User Name/Password Management functionality in E-Business Suite versions 12.1.3 through 12.2.6.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.3= 12.2.3= 12.2.4= 12.2.5= 12.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Oracle E-Business Suite is accessibleAttempt to access the Oracle E-Business Suite login page via HTTP or HTTPS (typically ports 8000-8009 or 443). Check for Oracle E-Business Suite login portal.Affected if The E-Business Suite is reachable over the network on HTTP ports.
-
Determine E-Business Suite versionAccess the version information page or check the login page footer for version display. Common paths include /OA_HTML/AppsLogin or /login, or query the ICX_INDEX page.Affected if Installed version matches 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, or 12.2.6.
-
Confirm User Management module is enabledLog in as an administrator and navigate to User Management or User Name/Password Management functionality. Check if the Oracle User Management responsibility is available in the responsibility menu.Affected if The User Name/Password Management module is accessible and functional in the environment.
-
Check HTTP exposure of User ManagementVerify that the E-Business Suite is accessible over unencrypted HTTP (port 80 or 8000-8009) rather than only HTTPS. Use network capture or check web server configuration.Affected if The application is accessible via HTTP instead of being restricted to HTTPS only.
-
Inspect for missing CSRF protectionsExamine HTTP requests when using User Management features. Check if the requests include anti-CSRF tokens (such as OAUTHTOKEN or similar tokens) in forms for user creation, password reset, or modification operations.Affected if User Management requests lack anti-CSRF tokens and do not validate the Referer header.
The environment is affected if Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.1.3 through 12.2.6 are running with the User Management module accessible over HTTP without CSRF protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Update patches for CVE-2017-3515. Implement anti-CSRF tokens and referer validation in Oracle User Management. For interim mitigation, restrict HTTP access to trusted networks and monitor for suspicious user management operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data