CVE-2017-3851
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Directory Traversal vulnerability in the web framework code of the Cisco application-hosting framework (CAF) component of the Cisco IOx application environment could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read any file from the CAF in the virtual instance running on the affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted requests to the CAF web interface. The impacts of a successful exploit are limited to the scope of the virtual instance and do not impact the router that is hosting Cisco IOx. Cisco IOx Releases 1.0.0.0 and 1.1.0.0 are vulnerable. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuy52302.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Directory Traversal vulnerability exists in the Cisco application-hosting framework (CAF) component of Cisco IOx. The flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the CAF within the virtual instance by submitting crafted requests with path traversal sequences. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in the web framework code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1\(0\)= 1.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco IOx is installedCheck for the presence of Cisco IOx installation by looking for IOx-related processes, services, or packages on the system. On Cisco network devices, use 'show iox' or check the device management interface for IOx capabilities.Affected if Cisco IOx is not installed on the system - no action needed. If installed, proceed to version check.
-
Determine the installed Cisco IOx versionRun the command to display the IOx version - typically 'show version' or 'show iox-host' depending on the device platform, or check the package/version information in the IOx management interface.Affected if The installed version matches 1.1.0.0 or 1.1.0, or falls within the 1.1.0.x branch - the system is potentially vulnerable.
-
Verify the CAF web interface is enabledCheck the status of the CAF (Cisco Application Hosting Framework) web service. On IOx-enabled devices, verify if the web framework component is running and accessible. Look for the CAF service status in the IOx management interface or via device CLI commands.Affected if The CAF web interface is enabled and accessible - this is required for the directory traversal to be exploitable. If disabled, the vulnerability cannot be triggered.
-
Check network exposure of the CAF serviceIdentify if the CAF web service is exposed to network access. Review the device network configuration to determine if the IOx web interface is reachable from untrusted networks or if it is isolated to trusted management networks.Affected if The CAF web interface is network-accessible from untrusted sources - an unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit the directory traversal vulnerability.
The system is affected if Cisco IOx version 1.1.0.0 or 1.1.0 is installed AND the CAF web interface is enabled and network-accessible, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to submit path traversal requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOx to a patched release beyond versions 1.0.0.0 and 1.1.0.0, or implement input validation controls at the web interface to block path traversal patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3851 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data