CVE-2017-4911
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware Workstation (12.x prior to 12.5.3) and Horizon View Client (4.x prior to 4.4.0) contain multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities in JPEG2000 parser in the TPView.dll. On Workstation, this may allow a guest to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs Workstation. In the case of a Horizon View Client, this may allow a View desktop to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs the Horizon View Client. Exploitation is only possible if virtual printing has been enabled. This feature is not enabled by default on Workstation but it is enabled by default on Horizon View.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities exist in the JPEG2000 image parser within TPView.dll, the virtual printing component of VMware Workstation and Horizon View Client. Attackers can exploit these by sending specially crafted JPEG2000 images that, when processed by the virtual printing feature, trigger buffer overflows allowing code execution or denial of service on the host operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 4.1= 4.2= 4.3= 12.0= 12.0.1= 12.1= 12.1.1= 12.5= 12.5.1= 12.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed VMware product and versionOn Windows: Open Control Panel > Programs and Features, locate VMware Workstation or Horizon View Client and note the version. On Linux: Check /usr/bin/vmware-installer or run 'vmware -v' for Workstation. For Horizon View Client, check /opt/vmware/viewclient or the application's About section.Affected if The installed version matches any of the following: VMware Workstation 12.0, 12.0.1, 12.1, 12.1.1, 12.5, 12.5.1, 12.5.2 or VMware Horizon View Client 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3
-
Locate TPView.dll to confirm virtual printing componentSearch for TPView.dll in the VMware installation directory. Typical paths: C:\Program Files\VMware\VMware Workstation\TPView.dll or C:\Program Files (x86)\VMware\VMware View\Client\TPView.dll. Use File Explorer search or command: dir /s C:\TPView.dllAffected if TPView.dll exists in the VMware installation directory, confirming the virtual printing component is installed
-
Check if virtual printing is enabledFor VMware Workstation: Go to Edit > Preferences > Printer, or check the virtual printer settings in the VM. For Horizon View Client: Check View Client settings or policy configurations. Verify if a virtual printer is listed as connected to any virtual machine.Affected if Virtual printing is enabled and a virtual printer is available or connected to any virtual machine, creating the attack surface for CVE-2017-4911
-
Verify JPEG2000 image processing capabilityThe vulnerability triggers when a JPEG2000 image is processed through the virtual printing pipeline. Check if the system has applications capable of opening or generating JPEG2000 (.jp2) images, or if any VMs have software that auto-processes images.Affected if Users or processes can open JPEG2000 images within the virtual machine, which could be processed by the vulnerable TPView.dll virtual printing component
You are affected if VMware Workstation 12.0-12.5.2 or Horizon View Client 4.0-4.3 is installed AND the virtual printing feature (TPView.dll) is enabled, allowing specially crafted JPEG2000 images to trigger the buffer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches (VMware Workstation 12.5.3 or later, Horizon View Client 4.4.0 or later). If patching is not immediately feasible, disable virtual printing as a compensating control until patches can be applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-4911 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-4911 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data