CVE-2017-4955
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.65, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.48, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.28, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.5. Several credentials were present in the logs for the Notifications errand in the PCF Elastic Runtime tile.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSensitive credentials were inadvertently written to log files for the Notifications errand in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime. This is an information disclosure vulnerability where authentication secrets were exposed in plaintext logs, potentially allowing unauthorized access to the affected system components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.0= 1.6.1= 1.6.2= 1.6.3= 1.6.4= 1.6.5= 1.6.6= 1.6.7= 1.6.8= 1.6.9= 1.6.10= 1.6.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Elastic Runtime versionUse the cf CLI or Ops Manager interface to query the installed version of Elastic Runtime. In Ops Manager, navigate to the Elastic Runtime tile and check the version information.Affected if The installed version matches 1.6.0 through 1.6.11 inclusive.
-
Identify if Notifications errand is deployedCheck the deployment manifest or query the Cloud Foundry deployment for the presence and status of the Notifications errand component.Affected if The Notifications errand is present in the deployment.
-
Locate Notifications errand log filesAccess the log files generated by the Notifications errand. These are typically stored in the VM where the Notifications errand runs, under paths such as /var/vcap/sys/log/notifications or similar log directories for the Notifications component.Affected if Log files exist for the Notifications errand.
-
Search log files for credential patternsGrep or search through the Notifications errand log files for patterns that resemble credentials, API keys, passwords, or tokens in plaintext. Look for strings containing keywords like 'password', 'secret', 'token', 'credential', or base64-encoded strings that may decode to sensitive values.Affected if Plaintext credentials, authentication secrets, or API tokens are found in the logs.
-
Review historical logs for exposureExamine archived or rotated log files from the Notifications errand, as credentials may have been written during specific operations. Check log rotation archives if available.Affected if Historical log files contain exposed credentials.
You are affected if your Elastic Runtime version is between 1.6.0 and 1.6.11 inclusive AND the Notifications errand is deployed, with plaintext credentials appearing in its log files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate PCF Elastic Runtime to version 1.6.65+, 1.7.48+, 1.8.28+, or 1.9.5+ as appropriate. Additionally, rotate any credentials that may have been exposed in the logs and review/clear affected log files.
Elastic Runtime 1.6.65 or later (or migrate to a supported 1.7.x/1.8.x/1.9.x line with respective patches: 1.7.48+, 1.8.28+, 1.9.5+)
- Log in to the Pivotal Cloud Foundry Ops Manager interface
- Navigate to the Elastic Runtime tile in the Installation Dashboard
- Click on the tile and select 'Upgrade'
- Select the appropriate stemcell if prompted
- Review and configure any new settings in the tile
- Click 'Apply Changes' to deploy the updated version
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the Elastic Runtime status
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-4955 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-4955 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data