CVE-2017-4991
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v260; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.16, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.10, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.12, and other versions prior to v3.17.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.14, 24.x versions prior to v24.9, 30.x versions prior to 30.2, and other versions prior to v36. Privileged users in one zone are allowed to perform a password reset for users in a different zone.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA zone isolation bypass vulnerability in Cloud Foundry's UAA (User Account and Authentication) server allows privileged users (zone admins) in one zone to perform password resets for users in a different zone, violating multi-tenant isolation boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 259<= 35= 13.1= 13.2= 13.3= 13.4= 13.5= 13.6= 13.7= 13.8= 13.9= 13.10= 13.11<= 4.2.0= 2.2.5.4= 2.7.1= 2.7.2= 2.7.3= 2.7.4= 2.7.4.1= 2.7.4.2= 2.7.4.3= 2.7.4.4= 2.7.4.5= 2.7.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify UAA versionLocate the UAA server version by querying the /info endpoint of the UAA API (e.g., curl https://uaa.your-domain/info) or check the BOSH deployment manifest for the uaabosh or uaa-release job versionAffected if The installed version matches any of the affected ranges: Cf Release <= 259, UAA Bosh <= 35 or versions 13.1-13.11, Pivotal UAA <= 4.2.0 or versions 2.2.5.4, 2.7.1-2.7.4.6
-
Confirm multi-tenant zone configurationQuery the UAA zones endpoint (e.g., /uaa/zones) using an admin token to list all configured zones. Check if multiple zones exist beyond the default zoneAffected if Multiple zones are configured and the UAA version is in the affected list
-
Identify zone admin usersList users granted zone-admin scope in each non-default zone by querying /uaa/zones/{zone-id}/users or reviewing UAA group memberships for the zoneadmin groupAffected if Zone admin users exist in any non-default zone and the UAA version is vulnerable
-
Verify cross-zone password reset behaviorUsing a zone admin token from one zone, attempt a password reset request for a user in a different zone (POST /uaa/zones/{target-zone}/users/{user-id}/password) and observe if it succeeds when it should be deniedAffected if The password reset succeeds for a user in a different zone, indicating the isolation bypass is present
-
Review audit logs for cross-zone password resetsSearch UAA audit logs (typically in theuaa.log or via the logging endpoint) for password_reset events where the zone context differs from the target user's zoneAffected if Audit logs show password reset events where the requesting zone admin belongs to a different zone than the user whose password was reset
Your environment is affected if the UAA version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND multiple zones with zone admins are configured, allowing cross-zone password resets to succeed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade UAA to patched versions: cf-release to v260+, UAA release to v3.17.0+/v3.9.12+/v3.6.10+/v2.7.4.16+, or uaa-release to v36+/v30.2+/v24.9+/v13.14+. Review zone admin permissions and monitor for unauthorized cross-zone password reset activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-4991 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-4991 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data