Dpc3928sl FirmwareOperating system · Technicolor

CVE-2017-5135

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-04-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Certain Technicolor devices have an SNMP access-control bypass, possibly involving an ISP customization in some cases. The Technicolor (formerly Cisco) DPC3928SL with firmware D3928SL-P15-13-A386-c3420r55105-160127a could be reached by any SNMP community string from the Internet; also, you can write in the MIB because it provides write properties, aka Stringbleed. NOTE: the string-bleed/StringBleed-CVE-2017-5135 GitHub repository is not a valid reference as of 2017-04-27; it contains Trojan horse code purported to exploit this vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Technicolor DPC3928SL DSL modem has a critical SNMP authentication bypass vulnerability where the device accepts any SNMP community string from the Internet instead of enforcing the configured community string. Additionally, the device provides write access to the MIB, allowing an attacker to modify SNMP values remotely without proper authentication.

MitigationImmediately block SNMP (UDP port 161) from the Internet at the network perimeter. If available, apply vendor firmware updates. If SNMP is required for management, implement IP-based access controls and use strong, non-default community strings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dpc3928sl FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= d3928sl-p15-13-a386-c3420r55105-160127a

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Check the device label or login to the router admin interface to confirm the model is Technicolor DPC3928SL
    Affected if The device is a Technicolor DPC3928SL DSL modem
  2. Check if SNMP UDP port 161 is exposed to the Internet
    Use an online port scanner or run 'nmap -p 161 -Pn <your-public-ip>' from an external network to test if UDP port 161 is reachable from the Internet
    Affected if UDP port 161 is open and reachable from the Internet
  3. Test SNMP authentication bypass
    From an external network, use 'snmpwalk -v2c -c public <public-ip> system' or try any community string. If any string returns SNMP data without rejection, the vulnerability is present
    Affected if SNMP responds to arbitrary community strings from external IPs without authentication failure
  4. Verify firmware version
    Login to the router admin interface and check the firmware version under status or system settings, or use 'snmpget' to query the device if SNMP is accessible
    Affected if Firmware version matches d3928sl-p15-13-a386-c3420r55105-160127a or is an earlier unreleased version

The device is affected if it is a Technicolor DPC3928SL with SNMP UDP port 161 exposed to the Internet and the firmware matches the affected version.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately block SNMP (UDP port 161) from the Internet at the network perimeter. If available, apply vendor firmware updates. If SNMP is required for management, implement IP-based access controls and use strong, non-default community strings.

Fix this in Dpc3928sl Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,180
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5135 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data