CVE-2017-5444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow vulnerability while parsing "application/http-index-format" format content when the header contains improperly formatted data. This allows for an out-of-bounds read of data from memory. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 52.1, Firefox ESR < 45.9, Firefox ESR < 52.1, and Firefox < 53.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the parsing of 'application/http-index-format' content within Firefox and Thunderbird. When headers contain improperly formatted data, the parser performs an out-of-bounds read, allowing memory access beyond allocated buffer boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 7.3= 7.4= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 6.0= 7.0< 45.9.0< 53.0= 52.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' or check Help > About Firefox in the application menuAffected if The reported version is before 45.9.0, is 52.0, or is before 53.0 (such as 52.x versions below 52.1)
-
Identify installed Thunderbird versionRun 'thunderbird --version' or check Help > About Thunderbird in the application menuAffected if Thunderbird is installed and the version is before the patched version (52.1 or later)
-
Check OS package versions on RHEL-based systemsRun 'rpm -qa | grep -i firefox' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i thunderbird' to list installed Mozilla package versionsAffected if The installed package version matches the affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions listed (6.0, 7.0, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5)
-
Check OS package versions on Debian systemsRun 'dpkg -l | grep -i firefox' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i thunderbird' to list installed packagesAffected if The installed package version corresponds to Debian Linux 9.0
You are affected if you have Firefox before 45.9.0, Firefox 52.0, Firefox before 53.0, or Thunderbird before 52.1 installed, or the corresponding OS package versions from the affected Red Hat or Debian distributions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data45.9.053.0
Upgrade to Firefox 53+, Firefox ESR 52.1+ (or 45.9+), or Thunderbird 52.1+ to obtain the vendor patch for this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data