CVE-2017-5563
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLibTIFF version 4.0.7 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer over-read in tif_lzw.c resulting in DoS or code execution via a crafted bmp image to tools/bmp2tiff.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLibTIFF 4.0.7 contains a heap-based buffer over-read vulnerability in tif_lzw.c, specifically triggered when the bmp2tiff tool processes a specially crafted BMP image. This out-of-bounds read can cause denial of service and potentially allow arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed LibTIFF versionRun `tiffinfo -v` or `tiffdump -v` to display the LibTIFF library version. Alternatively, check your system's package manager: `dpkg -l libtiff*` (Debian/Ubuntu), `rpm -qa | grep tiff` (RHEL/CentOS), or `brew list libtiff` (macOS).Affected if The reported version is exactly 4.0.7
-
Verify the bmp2tiff tool is presentCheck if the bmp2tiff binary exists in your system by running `which bmp2tiff` or locating it with `find /usr -name bmp2tiff 2>/dev/null`.Affected if The bmp2tiff executable is found on the system and is linked against LibTIFF 4.0.7
-
Confirm the vulnerable tif_lzw.c componentInspect the LibTIFF shared library for the tif_lzw.c module. On Linux, use `strings /usr/lib/*/libtiff.so* | grep -i lzw` or check the library linked to bmp2tiff with `ldd $(which bmp2tiff)` and verify the libtiff version.Affected if The library in use is version 4.0.7 and includes the LZW compression handling from tif_lzw.c
Your environment is affected if LibTIFF version 4.0.7 is installed and the bmp2tiff tool is available to process BMP image files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade LibTIFF to a version that patches this vulnerability; if immediate upgrading is not feasible, avoid processing untrusted BMP images with the bmp2tiff tool to prevent exploitation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5563 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data