CVE-2017-5635
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Apache NiFi before 0.7.2 and 1.x before 1.1.2 in a cluster environment, if an anonymous user request is replicated to another node, the originating node identity is used rather than the "anonymous" user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Apache NiFi clustered deployments, when an anonymous user request is replicated across nodes, the originating node's identity is incorrectly used instead of preserving the 'anonymous' user identity. This allows privilege escalation where anonymous users may inherit higher-privileged node identities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.7.0= 0.7.1= 1.1.0= 1.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NiFi versionRun 'nifi.sh --version' or check the release notes or log files for the installed NiFi version. Compare against affected versions: 0.7.0, 0.7.1, 1.1.0, or 1.1.1Affected if The installed version is one of the four affected versions listed in the CVE
-
Determine if NiFi is clusteredCheck the nifi.properties configuration file for the property 'nifi.cluster.is.enabled'. A value of 'true' indicates cluster mode is activeAffected if Clustering is enabled (nifi.cluster.is.enabled=true) - this vulnerability only affects clustered deployments
-
Verify anonymous access configurationCheck nifi.properties for properties related to anonymous access, such as 'nifi.security.anonymous.authorizer.enabled' or review the authorizer configuration to see if anonymous users are permittedAffected if Anonymous access is enabled in the authorization configuration
-
Inspect identity propagation in cluster communicationReview cluster node-to-node communication logs and access logs for instances where requests appear to originate from node identities rather than 'anonymous' when initiated by anonymous usersAffected if Logs show anonymous requests being attributed to node identities instead of the anonymous user principal
You are affected if NiFi is version 0.7.0, 0.7.1, 1.1.0, or 1.1.1 AND is running in cluster mode with anonymous access enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache NiFi to version 0.7.2 or 1.1.2 or later. In the interim, strictly control cluster node-to-node communication and implement access logging to detect anomalous identity usage.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5635 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5635 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data