Traffic ServerApplication · Apache

CVE-2017-5660

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-02-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server (ATS) 6.2.0 and prior and 7.0.0 and prior with the Host header and line folding. This can have issues when interacting with upstream proxies and the wrong host being used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Apache Traffic Server fails to properly handle Host headers with line folding (a deprecated HTTP header continuation format), causing requests to be routed to the wrong upstream host when ATS acts as a proxy. This can result in request routing to incorrect backends and potential data leakage or cache poisoning.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Traffic Server to a version beyond 7.0.0/6.2.0 that includes the fix, and/or implement strict Host header validation rules to reject malformed headers before processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Traffic ServerApplication
Affected:<= 6.2.0= 6.2.1= 6.2.2= 7.0.0
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Apache Traffic Server is installed
    Run `traffic_server -V` or ` trafficserver -V` to get the version, or check for the binary at typical locations like /usr/bin/traffic_server
    Affected if The command returns a version number matching <= 6.2.0, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, or 7.0.0
  2. Identify if ATS is configured as a proxy
    Examine the records.config or proxy.config files in the ATS configuration directory (typically /etc/trafficserver/) and look for proxy-related settings such as `proxy.config.http.proxy_enabled` or `CONFIG proxy.config.reverse_proxy.enabled` set to 1
    Affected if ATS is acting as a reverse proxy or forward proxy and the version is vulnerable
  3. Verify Host header handling configuration
    Check records.config for `proxy.config.http.host_folding` or similar settings related to Host header parsing. Also inspect any remap rules in remap.config that handle Host-based routing
    Affected if Host header handling is enabled or default, and the ATS version is vulnerable
  4. Test for line folding in Host headers
    Send a manually crafted HTTP request with a folded Host header (e.g., `Host: example.com\r\n continuation`) to the ATS proxy port and observe whether the request is forwarded to an unexpected upstream based on the folded portion
    Affected if Requests with folded Host headers are processed and routed to a different backend than expected based on the primary Host value

You are affected if Apache Traffic Server version 6.2.0 or below, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, or 7.0.0 is installed and configured to proxy requests, allowing malformed Host headers with line folding to route traffic to incorrect backends.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to a version beyond 7.0.0/6.2.0 that includes the fix, and/or implement strict Host header validation rules to reject malformed headers before processing.

Fix this in Traffic Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5660 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5660 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data