CVE-2017-6156
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen the F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.1, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system is configured with a wildcard IPSec tunnel endpoint, it may allow a remote attacker to disrupt or impersonate the tunnels that have completed phase 1 IPSec negotiations. The attacker must possess the necessary credentials to negotiate the phase 1 of the IPSec exchange to exploit this vulnerability; in many environment this limits the attack surface to other endpoints under the same administration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceF5 BIG-IP systems configured with wildcard IPSec tunnel endpoints contain a vulnerability allowing an authenticated remote attacker with phase 1 IPSec credentials to disrupt or impersonate tunnels that have completed phase 1 negotiations. The attacker leverages the wildcard configuration to manipulate phase 2 IPSec child security associations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.1= 11.2.1= 11.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the BIG-IP GUI under System > Software > Image List to determine the installed versionAffected if Version falls within 11.2.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.1, or 12.1.0-12.1.1
-
Verify IPSec module is enabledRun 'tmsh list net ipsec' or check via GUI under Network > IPSec to see if any IPSec tunnels are configuredAffected if Any IPSec tunnels exist on the system
-
Identify wildcard IPSec tunnel configurationsRun 'tmsh list net ipsec ipsec-profile' and examine the remote identifier settings. Look for profiles using wildcard values such as '0.0.0.0' or empty/any identifiers in the IPSec tunnel definitionsAffected if IPSec tunnels are configured with wildcard remote identifiers that accept any phase 1 initiator
-
Review IPSec tunnel endpoint settingsRun 'tmsh list net ipsec tunnel' and inspect the 'local-address' and 'remote-address' fields. Check for tunnels using 'any' or 0.0.0.0 as endpointsAffected if Tunnel endpoints are set to 'any' or 0.0.0.0 allowing unrestricted phase 1 connections
A system is affected if it runs an affected BIG-IP version AND has IPSec tunnels configured with wildcard endpoints that accept any phase 1 initiator credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched BIG-IP version beyond 12.1.1, 11.6.1, 11.5.5, or 11.2.1. Additionally, restrict IPSec phase 1 credentials to minimize the attack surface and ensure only trusted endpoints can initiate phase 1 negotiations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6156 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data