CVE-2017-6158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn F5 BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 there is a vulnerability in TMM related to handling of invalid IP addresses.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVulnerability in F5 BIG-IP's TMM (Traffic Management Microkernel) where improper handling of invalid IP addresses in network traffic can lead to a security issue. The flaw exists in specific versions of BIG-IP across multiple release branches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine BIG-IP base versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the login splash screen. On the command line, execute 'bigpipe version' or inspect /etc/product_version.Affected if The version falls within 11.2.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.0-11.6.1, or 12.0.0-12.1.2.
-
Identify enabled modulesRun 'tmsh list sys module' to list all installed and enabled BIG-IP modules. Alternatively, check 'tmsh show sys module' for module status.Affected if Any of these modules are enabled: Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Application Acceleration Manager (AAM), Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM), Analytics, Access Policy Manager (APM), Application Security Manager (ASM), Edge Gateway, or Global Traffic Manager (GTM).
-
Confirm TMM is activeRun 'tmsh show tmm' to verify the Traffic Management Microkernel is running. TMM is the component with the vulnerability.Affected if TMM is running, which is the default state for any BIG-IP system with traffic processing enabled.
-
Compare against affected version rangesCross-reference the identified BIG-IP version with the affected ranges: 11.2.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.0-11.6.1, or 12.0.0-12.1.2.Affected if The installed version exactly matches one of the affected versions or falls within one of the affected ranges.
If the BIG-IP version is 11.2.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.0-11.6.1, or 12.0.0-12.1.2 AND any traffic management module (LTM, AAM, AFM, APM, ASM, GTM, Edge Gateway, or Analytics) is enabled, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patch/upgrade to a BIG-IP version beyond 12.1.2 (for 12.x branch), 11.6.1 (for 11.6.x), 11.5.5 (for 11.5.x), or 11.2.1 (for 11.2.x) as specified in F5 security advisory.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data