CVE-2017-6159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedF5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1 are vulnerable to a denial of service attack when the MPTCP option is enabled on a virtual server. Data plane is vulnerable when using the MPTCP option of a TCP profile. There is no control plane exposure. An attacker may be able to disrupt services by causing TMM to restart hence temporarily failing to process traffic.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceF5 BIG-IP systems running versions 11.6.0-11.6.1 and 12.0.0-12.1.2 contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the data plane (TMM) when the Multipath TCP (MPTCP) option is enabled on a virtual server's TCP profile. An attacker can trigger a TMM restart by sending specially crafted MPTCP traffic, causing temporary traffic processing failure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or access the web UI to view the system version under Device > OverviewAffected if The version falls within 11.6.0-11.6.1 or 12.0.0-12.1.2
-
Identify TCP profiles with MPTCP enabledRun 'tmsh list ltm profile tcp all-properties' and look for 'mptcp enabled' or 'mptcp enable' in the outputAffected if Any TCP profile has the MPTCP option set to enabled
-
Find virtual servers using MPTCP-enabled profilesRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual all-properties' and cross-reference the TCP profile names from the previous step to see which virtual servers reference themAffected if Any virtual server references a TCP profile with MPTCP enabled
-
Confirm TMM restart capability existsThis check confirms exposure: if you match both the version range AND have virtual servers using MPTCP-enabled TCP profiles, the TMM restart condition can be triggered by malicious MPTCP trafficAffected if You are on an affected version AND have virtual servers using MPTCP-enabled TCP profiles
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is 11.6.0-11.6.1 or 12.0.0-12.1.2 AND you have any virtual server using a TCP profile with the MPTCP option enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable the MPTCP option on affected TCP profiles applied to virtual servers, or upgrade to a patched version (13.0.0 or later, or 12.1.2 HF1 or later).
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data