CVE-2017-6163
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, APM, ASM, Link Controller, PEM, PSM software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.4.0 to 11.5.4, when a virtual server uses the standard configuration of HTTP/2 or SPDY profile with Client SSL profile, and the client initiates a number of concurrent streams beyond the advertised limit can cause a disruption of service. Remote client initiating stream beyond the advertised limit can cause a disruption of service. The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) data plane is exposed to this issue; the control plane is not exposed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceF5 BIG-IP devices with HTTP/2 or SPDY profiles combined with Client SSL profiles fail to properly enforce stream concurrency limits. When clients initiate concurrent streams exceeding the advertised limit, it causes disruption of the TMM (Traffic Management Microkernel) data plane, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.4.0, <= 11.5.3= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.4.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.4.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.5.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.5.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.5.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2>= 11.5.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2> 11.4.0, <= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP versionRun `tmsh show sys version` or check the BIG-IP GUI under System > Software Management > Install ISO to confirm the running version numberAffected if The version matches any of these: 11.4.0-11.5.3, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 12.0.0-12.1.2 (all 11.5.4+ versions in the 11.x line are NOT affected except 11.6.0 and 11.6.1)
-
Locate HTTP/2 profilesIn the BIG-IP GUI, go to Local Traffic > Profiles > HTTP/2, or run `tmsh list ltm profile http2` to list all HTTP/2 profiles configured on the deviceAffected if Any HTTP/2 profile exists on the device (even if not assigned to a virtual server, the presence matters for attack surface)
-
Locate SPDY profilesIn the BIG-IP GUI, go to Local Traffic > Profiles > SPDY, or run `tmsh list ltm profile spdy` to list all SPDY profiles configured on the deviceAffected if Any SPDY profile exists on the device
-
Verify Client SSL profiles are combined with HTTP/2 or SPDYFor each virtual server, check if it references both a Client SSL profile and an HTTP/2 or SPDY profile. Run `tmsh list ltm virtual` and inspect the 'profile' section for combinations of clientSsl and http2 or spdy profilesAffected if A virtual server has both a Client SSL profile and an HTTP/2 or SPDY profile assigned to it simultaneously
-
Confirm stream concurrency settingsExamine the HTTP/2 or SPDY profile settings for the 'Concurrent Streams Per Connection' or equivalent limit setting by running `tmsh list ltm profile http2 <profile_name>` or `tmsh list ltm profile spdy <profile_name>`Affected if A limit is set but may not be properly enforced (this is the vulnerable condition - the flaw is in enforcement, not configuration)
The device is vulnerable if it runs an affected version (11.4.0-11.5.3, 11.6.0, 11.6.1, or 12.0.0-12.1.2) AND has a virtual server with both an HTTP/2 or SPDY profile combined with a Client SSL profile.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade F5 BIG-IP to a fixed version (13.0.0+ or later 12.x/11.x patches per K05113982) that properly enforces HTTP/2 stream limits. Alternatively, disable HTTP/2/SPDY profiles if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6163 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6163 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data