CVE-2017-6164
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator and WebSafe software version 13.0.0, 12.0.0 - 12.1.2, 11.6.0 - 11.6.1 and 11.5.0 - 11.5.4, in some circumstances, Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) does not properly handle certain malformed TLS1.2 records, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or possible remote command execution on the BIG-IP system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP's Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM), which fails to properly handle certain malformed TLS 1.2 records. This processing error can be exploited by remote attackers sending specially crafted TLS1.2 packets, potentially leading to denial of service or remote command execution on affected BIG-IP systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.1>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 13.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or 'bigpipe version' from the command line to retrieve the software versionAffected if The version falls within 11.5.0-11.5.4, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 12.0.0-12.1.2, or 13.0.0
-
Confirm the BIG-IP module or product nameRun 'tmsh show /sys product' or check the installed module list via 'tmsh list sys module'Affected if The system is running any of: Local Traffic Manager, Application Acceleration Manager, Advanced Firewall Manager, Analytics, Access Policy Manager, Application Security Manager, Dns, or Global Traffic Manager
-
Verify TLS 1.2 profile configurationRun 'tmsh list /ltm profile client-ssl' and 'tmsh list /ltm profile server-ssl' to list SSL profiles, then inspect each profile with 'tmsh show /ltm profile client-ssl <profile_name>' to check if TLS 1.2 is enabledAffected if TLS 1.2 is enabled in any client-ssl or server-ssl profile (look for 'tls version 1.2' or 'version { tls1.2 }' in the configuration)
-
Check if TMM is processing TLS trafficReview the SSL profiles attached to virtual servers by running 'tmsh list /ltm virtual' and examining which SSL profiles are assignedAffected if Virtual servers are using SSL profiles with TLS 1.2 enabled, meaning TMM is processing vulnerable TLS 1.2 traffic
The environment is affected if the installed BIG-IP version matches one of the affected ranges (11.5.x, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 12.0.0-12.1.2, or 13.0.0) AND TLS 1.2 profiles are configured on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade F5 BIG-IP software to patched versions (13.1.0+, 12.1.3+, 11.6.2+, 11.5.5+) and apply available hotfixes. Consider implementing TLS inspection controls and rate limiting as interim measures.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6164 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6164 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data