CVE-2017-6284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNVIDIA Security Engine contains a vulnerability in the Deterministic Random Bit Generator (DRBG) where the DRBG does not properly initialize and store or transmits sensitive data using a weakened encryption scheme that is unable to protect sensitive data which may lead to information disclosure.This issue is rated as moderate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNVIDIA Security Engine contains a vulnerability in its Deterministic Random Bit Generator (DRBG) where the DRBG fails to properly initialize, resulting in use of a weakened encryption scheme that cannot adequately protect sensitive data, leading to potential information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.2all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelDetermine if the device is an Nvidia Shield TV or an Android device that incorporates NVIDIA's Security Engine hardware component. Check the device specifications or system information.Affected if Device is an Nvidia Shield TV or an Android device with NVIDIA Security Engine hardware
-
Check Nvidia Shield TV firmware versionOn the Shield TV, navigate to Settings > About > Version to view the firmware build number. Compare against the affected range.Affected if Firmware version is 6.2 or lower (build numbers at or below the 6.2 release)
-
Check for NVIDIA Security Engine on AndroidInspect system hardware information or use a system info app to verify if the device includes NVIDIA Security Engine hardware. This is typically present on NVIDIA-powered Android devices.Affected if Device runs any Android version AND includes NVIDIA Security Engine hardware component
-
Verify DRBG initialization behaviorExamine cryptographic output from the Security Engine if accessible via diagnostic tools. The vulnerability causes predictable random number generation due to improper initialization.Affected if Random bit generation from the Security Engine shows patterns or fails statistical randomness tests
A user is affected if they use an Nvidia Shield TV with firmware 6.2 or lower, or any Android device that contains NVIDIA's Security Engine hardware with the DRBG initialization vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply NVIDIA-provided firmware updates for the Security Engine that address the DRBG initialization and encryption weaknesses. Verify that random number generation now meets cryptographic standards.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data