CVE-2017-6683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the esc_listener.py script of Cisco Elastic Services Controllers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the tomcat user on an affected system, aka an Authentication Request Processing Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability. More Information: CSCvc76642. Known Affected Releases: 2.2(9.76).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the esc_listener.py script of Cisco Elastic Services Controller allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as the tomcat user. The vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of input during authentication request processing, enabling shell command execution through the script.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.2\(9.76\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Elastic Services Controller installationSearch for Cisco ESC installation directories, services, or processes on the system. Look for process names containing 'esc' or 'tomcat' that may indicate Cisco ESC is running.Affected if Cisco Elastic Services Controller software is installed on the system
-
Verify installed version matches 2.2(9.76)Locate the Cisco ESC version information, typically found in the installation directory, version file, or via the escadm CLI tool if available. Compare the installed version string to 2.2(9.76).Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.2(9.76)
-
Locate esc_listener.py scriptSearch the filesystem for the esc_listener.py script, typically found within the Cisco ESC installation directory structure under scripts or bin folders.Affected if The esc_listener.py script exists on the system and is part of the Cisco ESC installation
-
Confirm management interface accessibilityCheck network listening ports and firewall rules to determine if the Cisco ESC management interface (typically ports 443, 8443, or similar) is exposed to network access. Review access control lists and network configurations.Affected if The Cisco ESC management interface is accessible from network segments beyond localhost or trusted admin networks
A system is affected if Cisco Elastic Services Controller version 2.2(9.76) is installed with the esc_listener.py component and its management interface is network-accessible to authenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco vendor patch when available; if no patch exists, implement network access controls to restrict management interface exposure and consider disabling or replacing the vulnerable esc_listener.py component.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data